Instagram story viewer> @sunniiiii_d> Post
Dani Olson-Lopes(sunniiiii_d)'s profile avatar

Dani Olson-Lopes

@sunniiiii_d

2 years ago
Co Creator: stephenxsv
Photo by Dani Olson-Lopes on May 15, 2024.
Photo by Dani Olson-Lopes on May 15, 2024.
Photo by Dani Olson-Lopes on May 15, 2024.
Photo by Dani Olson-Lopes on May 15, 2024.
Photo by Dani Olson-Lopes on May 15, 2024.
Photo by Dani Olson-Lopes on May 15, 2024.
Photo by Dani Olson-Lopes on May 15, 2024.
Download
0
Posted On: May 15th 2024, 06:26 pm
Tagged Users:
@stephenxsv
stephenxsv
Trotting through Turkey 🇹🇷🦃
.
.
.
#turkey #gobblegobble

More posts

escaped to the countryside w/ @exercere_ 🐻🍃🐞🧺🥧🪵🍂
Отбасылық Тренд Ұн ЕМЕС КРАХМАЛ КУКУРУЗНЫЙ ✊🫂 #тренд #тренд2026
No one should be this comfortable spending this much time in one of the most dangerous locations within a structure. There is a time and place for everything. The conditions in this video are not favorable for a slow deliberate clear. Everyone is yelling, you’re announcing and there is entirely too much talking at the breach point. This is what happens when a TTP is adopted without understanding the principles and conditions that justify and warrant its application. What drives law enforcement teams toward this approach in daylight conditions, inside structures with walls that offer little to no ballistic protection? Low skill? Fear? An obsession with officer safety? Decades of operating unopposed? I suspect it’s a combination of all four. Over time, these factors have become so ingrained in the institutional thought process that teams now mistake apprehension for discipline and inactivity for safety. The result is a level of execution that raises legitimate questions about whether some teams possess the competence to conduct opposed entries at all. When you operate unopposed, almost anything works. That doesn’t make it sound tactics. It means your methods have never been meaningfully tested. You can spend an entire career doing things poorly and getting acceptable outcomes because nobody ever challenged what you were doing. But if you train against the most dangerous course of action, your understanding changes. You recognize that exposure has consequences, hesitation has a cost, and an adversary has a vote. Set the specific technique aside for a moment. What stands out here is the execution. It appears apprehensive, uncertain, and devoid of any real sense of purpose. There is no apparent urgency, and very little to suggest confidence in the actions being performed. Being deliberate is not the same as being slow. Being cautious is not the same as being safe. And being unopposed is not evidence of competence. The standard cannot be whether a technique works when nobody fights back. The standard is whether your training, judgment, and execution hold up when someone does. What are your thoughts? Have a good one. XRAY ALPHA | STACK THE ODDS
lara dutta steps in for an event outing
And you 🤪
little joys
back to up