Instagram story viewer> @ale14abc> Post
ale14abc(ale14abc)'s profile avatar

ale14abc

@ale14abc

4 years ago
Photo by @ale14abc on September 16, 2022.
Photo by @ale14abc on September 16, 2022.
Photo by @ale14abc on September 16, 2022.
Photo by @ale14abc on September 16, 2022.
Download
6
Posted On: September 16th 2022, 06:54 pm
Drip 💧
Comments (6)
angelwil_dr 4 years ago

angelwil_dr

🥵🥵🥵

josephina_jky21 4 years ago

josephina_jky21

I fuck wit it🔥

josephina_jky21 4 years ago

josephina_jky21

Diggin it☑️

josephina_jky21 4 years ago

josephina_jky21

Just keepin it real 💯

josephina_jky21 4 years ago

josephina_jky21

I see u with the drip Alr alr👀

More posts

Missing my long hair 🥹
No one stood up
Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong. Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem. Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.” Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic. Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.
Towel…
happy birthday, my Scorpio 💓 @olena_svitlytska
back to up