Instagram story viewer> @kylenc_> Post
Kyle(kylenc_)'s profile avatar

Kyle

@kylenc_

4 years ago
Photo by Kyle on December 24, 2022.
Photo by Kyle on December 24, 2022.
Download
3
Posted On: December 24th 2022, 09:16 pm
Juicebox, tank top, tube socks / Dude stop, forehead shiny like a new Glock
Comments (3)
thebigbasi 4 years ago

thebigbasi

Elongated kyle

wrldpeach 4 years ago

wrldpeach

Cool pic

itsoddreyy 4 years ago

itsoddreyy

You’re so freaking cool like dude ily forever

More posts

" " 🎥 مجددا ~ ‏ترامب يسخر من حركات المتحـ .،ـولين جنـ .،ـسيا في رياضة رفع الأثقال !
“Wolverine one, Buckeye zero.” Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed claimed victory while addressing supporters in Michigan. He'll be the first Muslim to serve in the US Senate. Tap the link in @BBCNews’s bio to follow midterm results live. #BBCNews
Bandit VS Bandit pengalihan isu karhutla, biar rakyat makin bingung
Final moments before a Learjet 60 crashed in Palm Beach County today 💔
The stars of the paddock are ready for Media Day! 🤩 #QatarGP🇶🇦 #MotoGP
Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong. Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem. Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.” Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic. Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.
back to up