Instagram story viewer> @aleaguileras> Post
ale aguilera(aleaguileras)'s profile avatar

ale aguilera

@aleaguileras

3 years ago
Download
2
Posted On: August 10th 2023, 03:17 am
Comments (2)
felipe_leiter 3 years ago

felipe_leiter

Ptaaa que wenaa es jaam

majesus.ar 3 years ago

majesus.ar

❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

More posts

Tinashe Tells Republican Fan “Y’all Can Go” After Getting Checked Over Vote Blue Message Blogged by: Grace L. Tinashe had a quick message for a fan who was upset about her apparent support for Democrats on Election Day: “Y’all can go.” The singer found herself in a political back-and-forth on Tuesday, November 3, after sharing a message encouraging Americans to vote in the 2026 midterm elections. But it wasn’t her call for people to head to the polls that caused the issue. It was the blue hearts she added to the post. Tinashe originally wrote, “VOTE OR DIE ! LETS GO AMERICA” followed by a string of blue heart emojis. While she didn’t specifically name a Democratic candidate, the blue hearts were widely recognizable as a nod to the Democratic Party, which uses blue as its signature color. One X user wasn’t feeling it. She accused Tinashe of pushing away her Republican fans and suggested the singer should have considered her politically conservative audience before posting. “You literally just refuse to listen to those of us with sense. Did you have to have the blue hearts…alienating your red audience? Girl, are you neurodivergent? It gets to a point…” the user wrote. Instead of getting into a long debate, explaining her political views, or apologizing for the emojis, Tinashe gave her a response that was short and straight to the point. “Yall can go ✌️” And that was that. The exchange made it clear that Tinashe wasn’t interested in changing how she expresses herself politically to keep every fan happy. Janet had specifically complained about the singer alienating her red audience, a reference to Republican voters, and Tinashe’s answer didn’t exactly suggest she was worried about losing them. For anyone who has followed Tinashe outside of her music career, her political views shouldn’t come as a complete surprise. Back in 2020, the singer was vocal about her opposition to Donald Trump during his first term. In an October 2020 feature published by Pitchfork, Tinashe criticized Trump’s leadership and spoke about how his policies affected marginalized communities. She also encouraged Americans to take voting seriously.
Loveee the outfitttt!! Dekho Zara Uff 🙈✨ Styled by @sanjamkaur92 Photographer @tridevsudevan HMU @dhanyaraghavan @sreedevigautham Outfit @payalkeyalofficial Jewels @golecha_jewels Clutch @meera_mahadevia via @amigos.rizwan Footwear @stoffastyle
GUCCI GIFT    Framing the holidays with new styles to ring in the festive season.    Photography by: Daniel Arnold     #GucciGift THE GOSSIP BAG    #GucciGift #GucciGossip
King Fog 🤝 Fog Father @bigjohngolfs @jasonwilliams55 #bigjohn #allheart #internetinvitational
Mrs. Nita Ambani graced the launch of The Library at NMACC in a stunning display of timeless elegance, wearing the exquisite Soaring Spirit dragonfly brooch by renowned jewellery artist Wallace Chan. A masterpiece of craftsmanship, the striking creation added a touch of artistic brilliance to an occasion celebrating the beauty of literature, imagination and the timeless magic of books.
Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong. Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem. Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.” Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic. Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.
back to up