Instagram story viewer> @frankie.bbbbbbb> Post
FrankieB(frankie.bbbbbbb)'s profile avatar

FrankieB

@frankie.bbbbbbb

a year ago
Photo by FrankieB on July 08, 2025.
Photo by FrankieB on July 08, 2025.
Download
28
Posted On: July 8th 2025, 07:15 pm
Little miss ….
Comments (28)
eloisecollett a year ago

eloisecollett

:0000

fabianghete a year ago

fabianghete

Chin up, PRINCESS, or the crown slips

_.sofiaturner a year ago

_.sofiaturner

😍

_.sofiaturner a year ago

_.sofiaturner

Wtffffff

_.sofiaturner a year ago

_.sofiaturner

Omgggg hottttestttttttt

oneda.d a year ago

oneda.d

Hellooooo👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥❤️

lowk3ybiiihh a year ago

lowk3ybiiihh

little miss gorgeous🤩

lowk3ybiiihh a year ago

lowk3ybiiihh

woww😍😍

patricktuft_ a year ago

patricktuft_

Woww 😍😍

elizabowen_ a year ago

elizabowen_

🤩🤩

tori_kinleyyy a year ago

tori_kinleyyy

Little miss sexy as hell

eriicrh a year ago

eriicrh

Ur magic

Load More

More posts

Selfie of the Year! Orry, Saif Ali Khan and Kareena Kapoor Khan in one frame! 🔥 Orry’s got the tea, but the Pataudis have the ghee! 😂
Lately 🍂
#reality #reelsgrowth #instafashion #highlights #instagramer
🌼💫 Wearing @zuleiha_by_shehazeen Jewels @pureallurejewellery Styling @styledbysmiji Assisted by @swayaaneesh Hair @seema_haaridas_official 📸 @jaisonmadany Set design @aparna_artbyas_smile
No one should be this comfortable spending this much time in one of the most dangerous locations within a structure. There is a time and place for everything. The conditions in this video are not favorable for a slow deliberate clear. Everyone is yelling, you’re announcing and there is entirely too much talking at the breach point. This is what happens when a TTP is adopted without understanding the principles and conditions that justify and warrant its application. What drives law enforcement teams toward this approach in daylight conditions, inside structures with walls that offer little to no ballistic protection? Low skill? Fear? An obsession with officer safety? Decades of operating unopposed? I suspect it’s a combination of all four. Over time, these factors have become so ingrained in the institutional thought process that teams now mistake apprehension for discipline and inactivity for safety. The result is a level of execution that raises legitimate questions about whether some teams possess the competence to conduct opposed entries at all. When you operate unopposed, almost anything works. That doesn’t make it sound tactics. It means your methods have never been meaningfully tested. You can spend an entire career doing things poorly and getting acceptable outcomes because nobody ever challenged what you were doing. But if you train against the most dangerous course of action, your understanding changes. You recognize that exposure has consequences, hesitation has a cost, and an adversary has a vote. Set the specific technique aside for a moment. What stands out here is the execution. It appears apprehensive, uncertain, and devoid of any real sense of purpose. There is no apparent urgency, and very little to suggest confidence in the actions being performed. Being deliberate is not the same as being slow. Being cautious is not the same as being safe. And being unopposed is not evidence of competence. The standard cannot be whether a technique works when nobody fights back. The standard is whether your training, judgment, and execution hold up when someone does. What are your thoughts? Have a good one. XRAY ALPHA | STACK THE ODDS
back to up