Instagram story viewer> @aduseielijah161> Post

Elijah Adusei

@aduseielijah161

a year ago

@sarkodie Thanks for the blessings. Felt so good to have met you!
We feast tomorrow 🔥at Baba Yara

4

0

Posted On: September 26th 2025, 03:24 pm

Tagged Users:

@sarkodie

@sarkodie Thanks for the blessings. Felt so good to have met you!
We feast tomorrow 🔥at Baba Yara

More posts

It was all a dream ☁️ ✌🏾

just winging it 🪽🎪⭐️

🚨 في سن الـ41.. كريستيانو رونالدو يواصل تحطيم الأرقام القياسية، ويصبح أول لاعب في تاريخ كرة القدم يُرشَّح لتشكيلة أفضل 11 لاعبًا في العالم من FIFPRO بهذا العمر! 🤯👑🔥

I hope each of you are as happy as my billy

No one should be this comfortable spending this much time in one of the most dangerous locations within a structure.

There is a time and place for everything. The conditions in this video are not favorable for a slow deliberate clear. Everyone is yelling, you’re announcing and there is entirely too much talking at the breach point. This is what happens when a TTP is adopted without understanding the principles and conditions that justify and warrant its application.

What drives law enforcement teams toward this approach in daylight conditions, inside structures with walls that offer little to no ballistic protection?

Low skill? Fear? An obsession with officer safety? Decades of operating unopposed?

I suspect it’s a combination of all four.

Over time, these factors have become so ingrained in the institutional thought process that teams now mistake apprehension for discipline and inactivity for safety. The result is a level of execution that raises legitimate questions about whether some teams possess the competence to conduct opposed entries at all.

When you operate unopposed, almost anything works. That doesn’t make it sound tactics. It means your methods have never been meaningfully tested.

You can spend an entire career doing things poorly and getting acceptable outcomes because nobody ever challenged what you were doing.

But if you train against the most dangerous course of action, your understanding changes. You recognize that exposure has consequences, hesitation has a cost, and an adversary has a vote.

Set the specific technique aside for a moment.

What stands out here is the execution. It appears apprehensive, uncertain, and devoid of any real sense of purpose. There is no apparent urgency, and very little to suggest confidence in the actions being performed.

Being deliberate is not the same as being slow. Being cautious is not the same as being safe. And being unopposed is not evidence of competence.

The standard cannot be whether a technique works when nobody fights back.

The standard is whether your training, judgment, and execution hold up when someone does.

What are your thoughts?

Have a good one.

XRAY ALPHA | STACK THE ODDS

Soooo ethereal 🧚🏼‍♂️