Instagram story viewer> @sallam_design> Post
Sallam Design | Printing NJ(sallam_design)'s profile avatar

Sallam Design | Printing NJ

@sallam_design

7 months ago
Download
5
Posted On: April 16th 2026, 04:18 pm
Your eyes decide

before you do.

Design shapes the choice.

👉 Follow for more. #DesignPsychology
#PackagingDesign
#BrandStrategy
#VisualBranding
#CreativeDirection
Comments (5)
zenithdigital.bd 3 months ago

zenithdigital.bd

❤️

rania_darwish_13 7 months ago

rania_darwish_13

😍😍😍

hanemdarwish 7 months ago

hanemdarwish

❤️🔥👏

riham.darwish 7 months ago

riham.darwish

🔥🔥🔥

More posts

OUR WINNER. The Champion of Hamburg. Joanna Wietrzyk | 00:56:10.⚡️
A gentleman in every sense of the word. 😍☕️🐶 A little coffee, a little sunshine, and the sweetest company. Sir @DavidBeckham making even the simplest moments look effortlessly special. 🤎✨🤩 📷🎥🎞️🎬 On set for @BOSS BY BECKHAM Fall/Winter 2026 #DavidBeckham #Coffee #Puppy #Dog #Dogsofinstagram
Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong. Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem. Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.” Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic. Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.
SHAI VS. SPIDA IN THE LAND 🔥 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (26.0 PPG) and the 4-2 @okcthunder visit Donovan Mitchell (22.7 PPG) and the 4-2 @cavs! 📺 7:00pm/et on Peacock and NBCSN
Lady G💋
The best vitamin ☺️ @ferrari
back to up