Instagram story viewer> @elektromaster_drogichin> Post
Электро Мастер(elektromaster_drogichin)'s profile avatar

Электро Мастер

@elektromaster_drogichin

6 months ago
Download
0
Posted On: April 28th 2026, 07:24 pm

More posts

ಕಿವಿ ಚುರುಕಾಗಿರ್ಬೇಕು.. ಕೈ ಹಿಡಿತದಲ್ಲಿರ್ಬೇಕು.. ಗೆದ್ರೆ ಪತ್ರದ ಇನಾಮು! @colorskannadaofficial #BBK13 #biggboss #colorskannada #jiohotstar #soundharyashetty
On Election Day in Houston, people are stopping and leaving "I Voted" stickers at a memorial for a man who was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in July. Lorenzo Salgado Araujo was driving in Houston's East End area when ICE agents tried to conduct a traffic stop as part of a "targeted operation" and he attempted to evade arrest, an ICE spokesperson said in a statement to CNN. Salgado Araujo's death brought an outpouring of grief and calls for transparency about immigration enforcement. Follow live updates at the link in @cnn's bio. 📸: Antranik Tavitian for CNN
New push car for Mullet 😂
Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong. Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem. Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.” Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic. Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.
You’re us+less and you Lie too much — Davido’s aide, Dre DMW, Fires Back at VeryDarkMan
back to up