4 months agoIf you can tell me do you think is big deference between norda 005 and salomon genessis in flat speed? Tnx
5 months ago@geoffreyburns I love reading these lab reports. Very interesting stuff! I got the Norda 005’s this year and enjoy them. But I’m training for Pikes Peak Ascent, and curious what you would choose for that race? Seems like Norda isn’t gonna give me as much benefit. I have considered RXT and your results show me why that may be a better idea. But is a trail shoe even necessary? Let me know what you think
5 months agoRan my marathon personal best in the exact Adios 3 🏃 They also performed really well in trailraces with more gravel surface 🔥 A great allround shoe 👟
5 months agoHave you run in the new adidas speed ultra’s? That shoe for me is fantastic pretty much on all terrains and surfaces. It feels the most like an actual super shoe but seriously trail worthy. I know a lot of people say it’s unstable but for me it’s not really at all and it behaves well in every scenario I’ve put it in.
5 months agoGreat job Geoff. Really interesting. Do the Vapors you used have many miles on them? And does that matter? Also, I’d love to see a downhill study. Seems functionally relevant considering the terrain of many ultras.
5 months ago@nordarun 005’s always fun to run in, my top shoe in my rotation. I want to hate it for the price but most of my daily runs are done with this shoe. So light and comfy.
5 months agoThe Adios Pro 4’s are more stable on light technical trails than either ASU model. If you are a good technical runner, there isn’t any reason why you wouldn’t choose them for gravel, smooth trails. The Conti rubber is surprisingly good.
5 months agoDo you think downhill testing would be tangibly different than your flat testing?
5 months agoNice study @geoffreyburns! I’ve been hearing a lot about the idea for a while now on our runs, but great to see the results. 👨🏼🔬
