Instagram story viewer> @sednomusic> Post

Sedno

@sednomusic

4 months ago

Co Creator:

m.filipiano

krzywybas

adambsax

dopalinski

26’

98

12

Posted On: June 28th 2026, 10:52 am

Tagged Users:

@festival_povalec

festival_povalec

@dopalinski

@m.filipiano

@slotartfestival

slotartfestival

@bluenotepoznan

@ncpp_opole

@adambsax

@opatovice71

@krzywybas

@klubmuzycznyliverpool

klubmuzycznyliverpool

@scena_nowa

@latozestrada

26’

Comments (12)

nala.events

6 days ago

nala.events

...::: czekamy na nowy krążek! ♋

karina.reske

4 months ago

karina.reske

Wspaniale!!! 🫠

ananguyen.music

4 months ago

ananguyen.music

Yeaaa🔥

ministrand_music

4 months ago

ministrand_music

🔥🔥🔥

by_megzy

4 months ago

by_megzy

🔥

paula.paulina.w

4 months ago

paula.paulina.w

No to do zobaczenia w Opolu 🔥❤️ @nataliiia96

paniholahola

4 months ago

paniholahola

No i super! Widzimy się we Wro jesienią ☺️

More posts

I’ll keep you guys updated

🎶 The Italian Christmas Donkeyyyy 🎶 😌🤌

Luci Baines Johnson came to celebrate last night.

We just took back her dad’s Senate seat.

King Kali 👑🤭

#kalis #tobago #carnival

Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem.

Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.”

Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic.

Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.