Instagram story viewer> @guidoferrari90> Post

Guido Ferrari

@guidoferrari90

2 months ago

34

1

Posted On: September 8th 2026, 10:28 pm

Tagged Users:

@demonfxpedals

Testeando el @demonfx5 TS Breaker

#test #guitarra #pedal #overdrive #blues

Comments (1)

caaamiga

2 months ago

caaamiga

👏

More posts

Feeling a little extra haseen in Haseens!
And guess what? Haseens 11.11 Sale is just around the corner @haseensofficial 💙

Styled by my fav @stylebyhassan @hassanabdullahofficial

So apparently black.swordd1 thinks “Trump and maga don’t like me” who wants to break it for him🤭. I think it’s time Jafar gets some love from maga 😈

#trump #maga #conservative #america #fyp

#TSRTBaeWatch: Let em know! #MiniBarbie showin love under her mannnnn #RodWave’s latest photo dump 👩🏽‍❤️‍💋‍👨🏾 (✍🏾: #TSRStaffTC)

Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem.

Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.”

Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic.

Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.