Instagram story viewer> @serqeygrey> Post

末

@serqeygrey

2 months ago

Photo by 末 on September 10, 2026. May be an image of harp, trumpet, clarinet and text.

6

0

Posted On: September 10th 2026, 04:09 pm

Tagged Users:

@thisischitra

@chitra.mp3

немного пою, singin
@thisischitra @chitra.mp3 thanks for your music

More posts

President Obama has a message for you: VOTE

🇮🇹 The Best Italian Police Officer of 2026

#Italy #police #carabinieri #streetphotography

Oh they SERVED 🌹🍽️ Jenna and Val’s Quickstep gave us all the #DisneyNight vibes we needed 🎉 #DWTS

Kanika Mann may not share a good equation with Arishfa, but she appreciates her individuality! ❤️ She said, “Meri Arishfa se nahi banti, but woh jaisi bhi individual khelti hai and I respect that.” Acknowledging someone’s game despite differences! 👏

#KanikaMann #ArishfaKhan #BiggBoss20 #BB20 #RealityScoop

Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem.

Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.”

Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic.

Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.

My first Halloween parade in NYC was a religious experience