Instagram story viewer> @yandel_photography> Post

MR-RECAP 🎬🔥

@yandel_photography

21 days ago

70

1

Posted On: October 14th 2026, 10:28 pm

Otra vez es Octubre 💒
.
.
#fuerzaregida #tuboda #filmmakers #méxico

Comments (1)

giopacheco_14

21 days ago

giopacheco_14

Duro mi bro @yandel_photography 🥵🥵🥵🥵

More posts

Can’t catch a break with this guy #animal #cat #catvideos #funnyvideo #funny

Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem.

Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.”

Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic.

Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.

Day 1/7! ✨ comment “turkey” and ill send you the link!

What should you wear to thanksgiving? I got you! every day for the next seven days, I’m gonna be giving you a new outfit for the holidays! That way you’re prepared to look absolutely amazing!! #midsize #size12

Meg and Hercules ✨💕
.
.
.
#ifbbpro #hercules #halloween #gymcouple #couplegoals

The joke writes itself, and that is the problem. The plan is to vote for Democrats to own Israel: hand the House and the Senate to the party of open borders, impeachment, and endless investigations, all to punish the one country in the Middle East that actually fights the people chanting death to America. The cartoon has the physics right. The man pulls the trigger, the blast goes backward, and the flag on the other side does not even flinch. The only person bleeding in the panel is the shooter.

And look at who he would be voting with. The campus encampments that spent last year harassing Jewish students. The squad members who call Israel an apartheid state and vote against Israel aid. The democratic socialist mayor of New York, who built his career on the same cause. These are the people who want Israel erased, and they are also the people who want the border erased, the deportations stopped, and the administration that carried them out investigated and dismantled. Fuentes’s own pitch included letting Democrats take the House and impeach the president. The impeachment is not the side effect. It is the point, and the point lands on his own side.

Israel will survive a Democratic midterm. Israel has survived worse than a livestreamer’s tantrum. What will not survive is the agenda the tantrum claims to defend: the closed border, the removals, the end of the foreign wars, the America First platform the groypers say they want. A Democratic Congress kills all of it in a week, and the people cheering loudest will be the ones who hate Israel and hate the groypers in equal measure. That is not owning anyone. That is volunteering to be the punchline, and the punchline votes on Tuesday.