Instagram story viewer> @ericcrebier> Post
Eric Crebier(ericcrebier)'s profile avatar

Eric Crebier

@ericcrebier

2 days ago
Download
0
Posted On: November 2nd 2026, 08:15 am

More posts

🥜🧈🍞🍵
OPTIONAL. Taking $1,800 out of somebody’s paycheck because they missed a work dinner on their wedding anniversary is already wild. But sending an email beforehand saying the dinner was OPTIONAL makes this whole situation even harder to understand. Because what exactly was optional? The dinner or keeping your paycheck? And the way she handled it is probably the best part of this entire story. No big argument. No begging. She simply asked payroll to show her the written policy that allowed the deduction. Apparently, nobody could find one. Now imagine being that boss sitting in a meeting with HR and the finance director while your own email is being used to explain why you had no business taking that money in the first place. That’s an uncomfortable Monday morning. But the story gets worse when HR discovers seven other employees had allegedly been treated the same way. One was even on medical leave. Another paid $600 for missing a Christmas party because she thought she had no choice. Six hundred dollars to miss a Christmas party. At that price, the party better have included a vacation package and a new refrigerator. There’s nothing wrong with companies wanting employees to participate in events. Team dinners can be great. Holiday parties can be fun. But there’s a difference between encouraging people to show up and making them feel like their paycheck depends on it. And that’s what makes this story so interesting. She didn’t need some elaborate plan to get her money back. She had her contract, her completed work, and the boss’s own words. A month later, she says she got promoted. Sometimes the most effective response isn’t an argument. It’s asking somebody to put their reasoning in writing. That boss probably wishes he’d never sent that email.
Who will walk out of @barclayscenter with the #ICTitle TONIGHT? Will it be @wwegable OR @official_ego?! #WWERaw
A video of All India Students’ Association (AISA) president Neha Bora alleging that priests commit rape inside temples has triggered a political controversy, with the BJP accusing her of insulting Hindu religious institutions and questioning Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s support for her. The undated clip circulated on November 3. In the video, Bora argues that women need protection from what she describes as the “Brahmanical system”. She alleges that the social order enables the oppression of vulnerable groups and leaves even Brahmin women unsafe. “Priests commit rapes inside temples,” she says, referring to sexual violence cases in Unnao and Kathua while making her argument. Sharing the footage, BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari described Bora as Rahul Gandhi’s “poster girl” and accused her of displaying “Hindu hate”. He sought to connect her remarks with Congress’s ideology, alleging that the party was targeting Hindu faith for electoral interests. BJP leader Gaurav Bhatia also condemned the comments as insulting to Hindu priests. These were the BJP leaders’ allegations. Bora’s reference to Kathua concerns the 2018 rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl who was held captive inside a village temple. In June 2019, a court convicted six men, with temple caretaker Sanji Ram among three sentenced to life imprisonment. The criticism centres on Bora’s sweeping language about priests and religious institutions. Responding to the controversy, BJP leader Nalin Kohli said rape was a heinous crime that should not be communalised, and demanded an apology and clarification over her remarks.
Once a brother always a brother ❤️‍🩹 . . . #scoutop #biggboss #biggboss20 #trending #reels
back to up