8 hours agobeltfedblue
The answer? DONT. If youβre arguing with a stupid person, what does that make you? π€·ββοΈ Arguing with an idiot is like trying to save someone whoβs drowning. Theyβll pull you under with them. Theyβll beat you with experience. Itβs like playing chess with a pigeon, no matter how right you are, and how wrong they are, they will just strut around on the chess board, shitting all over like they won anyway. And other stupid people will see them strut and think they won as well.
12 hours agooutlierandhappy
I like how you frame those as stupid whoβre thinking that wfh makes people lazy! π
18 hours ago_radioactivepanda_
And once you have excavated the whole rotten carcass of a belief youβll find it is completely devoid of truth or fact and entirely built on circular logic and a simple indomitable belief without any reason behind itβ¦π Arguing with stupid people is like playing chess with a pigeon. You can checkmate it all you want, it refuses or is incapable to learn the rules, throws around the pieces, and will fly off to claim it won resoundingly anyways.
a day agolace.m.up
How to pretend like you're speaking to someone in a podcast instead of talking directly to the camera
2 days agomamahaneen_bagis
βοΈ ππΌππ ππππ πΎππΌππππ (πππππ πππ πππΌππππππ)... πππ‘π‘ π£π€π©ππ..
3 days agocheeseaddiction3
But what if I asked "what made you think of that?" And then he says "no reason, thats what I think?"
3 days agothefirstquestions
The clarifying question works even better when you point it at yourself first. Plenty of what I defended hardest turned out to be an answer someone handed me, never checked. Asking where a belief came from before acting on it is what I call first questions, and it calms an argument faster than any proof. Have you tried your method on your own opinions?
More posts
