Instagram story viewer> @movementsciencelab> Posts

Hamail Arshad | Physical Therapist | Movement Science Lab

@movementsciencelab

759

followers

662

following

Doctor of Physical Therapy | Home Care PT on Long Island
I show adults what real physical therapy can do — in their home, in real life.

POSTS STORIES REELS

If your Physical Therapy session looks the same every single week — passive treatment, no exercises, no progress check — something is wrong.

Evidence-based Physical Therapy is active, progressive, and measurable. It includes a home exercise program, regular reassessment, and a clear plan that evolves as you improve.

Passive modalities like heat and ultrasound are not the problem on their own. The problem is when that is ALL you receive — session after session — with no exercise, no education, and no tracking of whether you are actually getting better.

You have the right to understand your treatment. You have the right to ask questions. And you have the right to know whether what you are receiving is working.

Save this. Share it with someone currently in Physical Therapy.

More coming soon — follow @MovementScienceLab for evidence-based movement education every week. #physicaltherapy #rehabscience #PTadvice #rehabilitation #longisland by @movementsciencelab

Most people think they need a doctor’s referral to see a physical therapist. They don’t.

In all 50 states — plus Washington, DC — you have the legal right to access physical therapy directly. No referral. No waiting room detour. No unnecessary delay in your recovery.

But here’s what most people still don’t know about what physical therapists actually do:

Physical therapists are licensed healthcare professionals whose scope of practice includes examination, evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention. They don’t just treat pain — they identify the root cause of movement dysfunction and design individualized, evidence-based treatment plans to fix it.

Their toolbox includes therapeutic exercise, manual therapy, neuromuscular retraining, gait re-education, resistance training, cardiovascular conditioning, and patient education — progressing from pain control all the way through return to full activity.

And the research on direct access is clear: → Lower total healthcare costs → Greater functional improvement → Higher patient satisfaction → Fewer imaging studies and medications → No evidence of harm

Physical therapists must earn a Doctor of Physical Therapy degree and pass the National Physical Therapy Examination before they can see a single patient. In military healthcare settings, their scope expands even further — including ordering diagnostic imaging and making direct specialist referrals.

In 2025, the American Physical Therapy Association officially recognized primary care physical therapy as a specialty and residency practice area. The profession is evolving. The question is whether your understanding of it is keeping up.

Save this post. Share it with someone who’s been putting off care because they thought they needed a referral first.

Follow @movementsciencelab for evidence-based movement education every week. #APTA #physicaltherapy #DPT #PT #longisland by @movementsciencelab

Physical therapists are not just part of rehab after the fact. They can be part of the front end of care.

As primary care demand continues to rise, physical therapy has an important role in helping patients with musculoskeletal conditions get faster, more efficient care. In collaborative and direct access models, PTs can help guide early management, improve access, reduce unnecessary imaging, and support better use of healthcare resources.

This is not a new idea. PTs have been part of primary care pathways for decades, and the profession continues to move toward a more active role in early triage and patient-centered care.

For low back pain especially, earlier involvement of physical therapy may help shorten the path to treatment and lower overall healthcare costs.

Physical therapy, primary care, direct access, low back pain, musculoskeletal care, and healthcare efficiency are more connected than many people realize.

#physicaltherapy #primarycare #lowbackpain #directaccesspt #movementsciencelab by @movementsciencelab

Most people choose hypertrophy exercises based on habit, popularity, or what feels hardest.

That is not the best way to build muscle.

Good exercise selection for hypertrophy comes down to a few key questions:

Does the exercise load the target muscle through a full range of motion?
Can you progressively overload it over time?
Does it create high muscle tension without excessive joint stress?
Is the target muscle actually the limiting factor?

Those questions matter because not all exercises stimulate muscle growth equally.

A movement can look impressive and still be a poor hypertrophy tool if it cuts the range short, is hard to progress, irritates your joints, or gets limited by something other than the muscle you are trying to train.

A better hypertrophy exercise usually does 4 things well:

1. It challenges the muscle through meaningful range, especially when the muscle is lengthened.
2. It allows steady overload through more load, more reps, or better execution over time.
3. It creates a strong muscular stimulus without beating up the joints.
4. It makes the target muscle do the work instead of letting grip, balance, or another body part fail first.

That gives you a more practical way to choose exercises in the gym.

For example:

* a chest movement should challenge the pecs, not just the front delts or shoulders
* a lat movement should be limited by the lats, not only by grip
* a hamstring movement should train the hamstrings, not just fatigue the lower back
* a quad movement should let you load the quads hard without unnecessary joint irritation

The goal is not to collect random exercises.

The goal is to choose movements that you can train hard, recover from, and progress for months and years.

Better exercise selection makes better programming possible.
And better programming makes muscle growth more predictable.

#exerciseselection #hypertrophy #musclebuilding #movementscience #trainingscience by @movementsciencelab

A lot of runners get stronger in the gym but never become stronger **for running**.

That is the difference between general strength and running-specific strength.

General strength builds the base. It improves overall force production, stability, and control. But if strength work does not begin to resemble the demands of running, it will not fully transfer to running mechanics.

That is where **running-specific strength training** matters.

Running-specific strength uses movements that look more like the gait cycle: one-leg stance, balance, force production into the ground, toe-off, swing, and body control under load. This matters because strength improves best when it matches the action you want to improve.

For runners, that means the goal is not just to build stronger muscles.

The goal is to build strength that improves:

* running economy
* propulsive force
* stride length
* fatigue resistance
* injury resilience

That is why seated leg extensions, for example, can strengthen the quadriceps without fully improving strength during running. The muscles may get stronger, but the pattern is not specific enough to the demands of gait.

A better progression is:
build **general strength first**, then move into **running-specific strength**.

That second phase is where exercises like one-leg squats, runner’s pose work, step-ups, one-leg deadlifts, and other gait-mimicking drills become more valuable. They challenge balance, coordination, stability, and force transfer in a way that is much closer to what running actually requires.

The big takeaway:

Not all strength work transfers equally.

If you want strength training to improve your running performance, running economy, and injury resistance, it needs to become more specific over time.

#hyrox #running #injuryprevention #movementscience #strava by @movementsciencelab

Most runners think injury prevention starts with stretching.

It usually starts with **training load**.

Running injuries are often the result of training stress rising faster than the body can tolerate. Every runner has an injury threshold, and that threshold is different for everyone. A beginner may get hurt with a load that an experienced runner handles easily. As strength and fitness improve, that threshold can rise. But when volume, intensity, or workout stress outpace recovery, injury risk goes up.

That is why flexibility is not the magic solution many people think it is.

Research does **not clearly support** flexibility or stretching as a major protector against running injury. Stretching may help some people, and post-run stretching may have some recovery value, but it does not appear to be the main factor keeping runners healthy. The bigger issue is whether your training is appropriate for your current capacity.

A more useful takeaway is this: **strength matters, especially eccentric strength.**

Eccentric hamstring training, such as the Nordic hamstring exercise, has been shown to reduce hamstring injury rates far more effectively than flexibility work alone. That makes sense because running places major eccentric demands on the hamstrings, especially when the leg is decelerating during high-speed movement. If the tissues are not prepared for that stress, problems can follow.

Another important point: the **10 percent rule** is not science. The 10 percent rule is the common recommendation that runners should increase their weekly mileage by no more than 10 percent from one week to the next. While it is often used as a general guideline, it does not account for intensity, workout type, fatigue, or individual tolerance. A training increase that works well for one runner may be too much for another.

The practical lesson is simple:

Build gradually.
Respect symptoms early.
Do not rely on stretching alone.
Train the tissues to handle the stress you are asking from them.

That is how smarter injury prevention starts.

#runninginjury #injuryprevention #runningtips #movementscience #evidencebasedfitness by @movementsciencelab

Running does not need to be extreme to matter.

Even modest amounts of running are linked with meaningful health benefits, including longer lifespan, lower risk of coronary heart disease, better mental health, lower disability risk with aging, and benefits that go far beyond body weight or performance.

One of the most striking ideas from the research is that each hour of running may add about two hours to a runner’s life. The bigger takeaway is simple: running can give a strong return on the time invested.

It also does not take as much as many people think. Even relatively small weekly amounts of vigorous exercise have been associated with lower mortality risk. That means you do not need perfect training, high mileage, or elite fitness to benefit.

Running also does not automatically destroy your knees. Long-term research does not support that common belief in the way people often assume.

Start smaller than your ego wants. Build gradually. Stay consistent enough for the benefits to compound.

#runningbenefits #longevity #hearthealth #brainhealth #movementscience by @movementsciencelab

Training a muscle once per week is one of the most common hypertrophy programming mistakes.

In most cases, muscle protein synthesis rises after training, then returns toward baseline within about 48–72 hours. That means the growth signal from one session does not last the entire week. If you only train a muscle once, you may be spending several days with no meaningful growth stimulus.

That is why training frequency matters. The goal is not necessarily to do more total work. The goal is to distribute weekly volume more effectively so each muscle gets more quality growth opportunities. For many people, training each muscle 2–3 times per week works better than a traditional once-a-week bro split.

If your progress feels slow, your split may be the problem — not your effort.

#trainingfrequency #hypertrophy #musclegrowth #programdesign #movementscience by @movementsciencelab

Your body at 70 is being built in your 40s.

Muscle health, resistance training, and healthy aging are deeply connected. The real issue is not just how fast muscle declines with age, but what level you start declining from. That is why midlife matters so much.

Your 40s are often when recovery gets slower, muscle becomes harder to maintain, and old habits stop working as well. But this is also the decade when smart training, adequate protein, and consistent recovery can still create a major long-term advantage.

Do not think of midlife as the end of the window. Think of it as the phase where your strategy has to mature.

#agingwell #musclehealth #resistancetraining #midlifehealth #longevity

Save this as your reminder to train for the body you want to keep. by @movementsciencelab

Muscle loss does not start in old age. It often starts in your 30s.

Sarcopenia, muscle loss, and aging are closely connected, but most people do not think about it until strength, function, and energy have already declined.
The real issue is not just looking smaller. It is losing the physical reserve that supports metabolism, mobility, recovery, and long-term independence.

The good news is that age-related muscle loss is highly responsive to the basics: strength training and adequate protein. The earlier you take muscle seriously, the more protection you build for later decades.

Save this as a reminder that muscle is not optional tissue. It is one of the biggest predictors of how well you age.

#sarcopenia #muscleloss #strengthtraining #healthyaging #movementscience

Save this post and follow Movement Science Lab for more evidence-based movement and health education. by @movementsciencelab

Most people think high daily protein is enough for muscle growth.

But muscle protein synthesis is not driven by your daily total alone. It is triggered meal by meal.

That is where the leucine threshold matters.

Leucine is the amino acid that helps activate the signal for muscle protein synthesis through mTOR. In simple terms: each meal needs enough high-quality protein to flip that switch on. If protein intake at a meal is too low, you may still be eating “healthy” or “high protein” overall, but you may miss the chance to maximally stimulate muscle building at that meal.

That is why protein per meal matters just as much as protein per day.
For most people, a practical target is about 30–50 g of quality protein per meal to reliably reach the leucine threshold. Older adults often need more per meal because the body becomes less responsive to smaller protein doses over time.

Why this matters: • 150 g of protein in one meal is not the same as • 50 g of protein across 3 meals

Each meal is a separate opportunity to stimulate muscle protein synthesis.

Practical examples that often help hit the threshold:

* 4–6 oz chicken, beef, or fish
* 3–4 whole eggs plus extra egg whites
* 1–1.5 scoops whey protein
* 1–1.5 cups cottage cheese

Plant proteins can absolutely work too, but they usually require more total volume or more strategic combinations because they tend to provide less leucine per gram.

The big takeaway: Do not just count protein. Distribute it well. Make each meal count.

If your goal is muscle growth, recovery, strength, healthy aging, or body recomposition, this matters more than most people realize.

Save this for your next grocery trip or meal plan.
#protein #longislandfitness #mealprep #musclegrowth #gymmeal by @movementsciencelab

The government’s protein recommendation was designed to prevent deficiency — not to optimize health. For most active adults, the RDA falls significantly short of what the research supports for muscle health, metabolic function, and healthy aging. This post breaks down what the RDA actually is, what the science actually recommends, and the simple daily target that makes the biggest difference.
 #proteinintake #proteinRDA #musclehealth #movementscience #nutritionscience
 Save this and follow Movement Science Lab for more evidence-based health and training education. by @movementsciencelab