Instagram story viewer> @lorraine.aguiar> Post
Lorraine Aguiar(lorraine.aguiar)'s profile avatar

Lorraine Aguiar

@lorraine.aguiar

4 years ago
Ouro nos 100m rasos 🥇🇧🇷
Download
15
Posted On: March 11th 2023, 09:23 am
Tagged Users:
@drajulianatristao
drajulianatristao
@fernando_atl
fernando_atl
@carlosjosecamilo
carlosjosecamilo
@sesportesoficial
sesportesoficial
Ouro nos 100m rasos 🥇🇧🇷
Comments (15)
ze_paulloo 4 years ago

ze_paulloo

Inevitável! 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

caixadeideias.podcast 4 years ago

caixadeideias.podcast

Maravilhosoooosss ❤️

correajoane 4 years ago

correajoane

Parabéns, sucesso sempre 🙌👏👏👏👏👏

joao_gael_alef 4 years ago

joao_gael_alef

Meus parabéns 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽🎊🎉

karolinaavellar 4 years ago

karolinaavellar

👏👏👏👏

indianarafg 4 years ago

indianarafg

😍😍😍

indianarafg 4 years ago

indianarafg

❤️❤️❤️❤️

indianarafg 4 years ago

indianarafg

👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

flaviaalessandramatosdeolivera 4 years ago

flaviaalessandramatosdeolivera

Merece e muito nega 👏👏🙌

nicolicns 4 years ago

nicolicns

Alémmmmm 🚀

islayanecosta 4 years ago

islayanecosta

👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

drajulianatristao 4 years ago

drajulianatristao

👏👏👏👏

Load More

More posts

خیره ایشالا . . #خنده #طنزجدید #رقص_جدید
4 + 1 + 7 World Driver Championships 💪 #MexicoGP
The Supreme Court on Monday (November 2) declined to urgently hear a plea challenging skyrocketing domestic airfares, with Justice Vikram Nath responding, “Don’t travel by air. Next case.” The remark came after a lawyer approached the court, alleging that flight ticket prices had surged by as much as 700%, particularly during festivals, holidays and periods of high demand. The advocate argued that air travel had become an essential service for millions of Indians and that such steep price increases violated Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. However, Justice Nath declined to take up the matter at that stage and moved on to the next case. The petition raised concerns over airlines’ dynamic pricing systems, under which ticket prices can rise dramatically within hours as demand increases. It sought regulatory guidelines to protect passengers from excessive and unpredictable fare hikes. Interestingly, the Supreme Court had earlier taken a different stance on the same broader issue. In January, Justice Nath had flagged the exploitation of passengers during festivals and major events, questioning why airlines were charging several times their usual fares. A separate PIL challenging arbitrary airline pricing is already pending before the Supreme Court. On October 16, the Centre informed the court that new aviation pricing rules had been finalised and approved. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on November 16. Importantly, the reported 700% increase was an allegation made before the court, not a figure independently established by the Supreme Court.
Я ЧЕМПИОН МИМО -ПОБЕДЫ 0 ПОРОЖЕНИ 18 😎☝️
History makers 🇮🇹 Congratulations to @kimi.antonelli on becoming the 2026 @f1 champion 🏆 Swipe to see Sinner & Antonelli meeting for the first time at 2025 @nittoatpfinals 🤝
The most UNREAL two wheeler challenge yet 🤣
back to up