Instagram story viewer> @diegonacamara> Post

Diego Camara

@diegonacamara

2 years ago

51

12

Posted On: March 3rd 2025, 01:13 pm

Tagged Users:

@suellenalbuquerques

suellenalbuquerques

@igor.soouz

@broadway.show_

Temporada de eventos 25 🎉 15anos da Sofia ❤️#15anosdossonhos #sonhos #familia

Comments (12)

ionar177

2 years ago

ionar177

Que lindo. Que elegante!

rodriguesmarciaferreira

2 years ago

rodriguesmarciaferreira

Uau... 👏👏👏👏👏

meirebezerra6

2 years ago

meirebezerra6

👏👏👏👏

igor.soouz

2 years ago

igor.soouz

Amooooo❤️

lucynarruc21

2 years ago

lucynarruc21

Topíssimo🤩

suellenalbuquerques

2 years ago

suellenalbuquerques

Amo ❤️

More posts

@yanghongwon @michyeogajigo ❤️

Already paying for Netflix or Prime? You could eventually need to pay towards the BBC too. 🇬🇧📺

Here’s how it works in the UK: a standard TV licence costs £180 a year, usually covering a household. You need one to watch or record live TV on any channel, including live sports or to use BBC iPlayer. That applies even if you already pay for Sky, Netflix or Prime.

But not everyone has to pay. If you only watch on-demand Netflix, Prime or ordinary YouTube videos, and don’t use BBC iPlayer, you currently don’t need a licence.

That distinction matters as more people move away from traditional television. Around 540,000 fewer licences were in force in 2025/26. The BBC also recorded a £121 million deficit that year, although that isn’t a loss caused solely by cancellations.

To address the funding pressure, a wider licence fee is being considered that could bring streaming-only households into the system—even those already paying for subscriptions and never watching the BBC. MPs have recommended broadening the fee from 2028, potentially reducing the amount each household pays.

This has NOT become law, and no new charge has been confirmed.

Should you have to fund the BBC if you never watch it or should paying be your choice? 👇

Strongest soldier

Siapa pergi konsert Dato’ Siti malam ni?
Lambai sikit 👋🏻😁