Instagram story viewer> @1_joc_> Post
Joc(1_joc_)'s profile avatar

Joc

@1_joc_

10 months ago
Photo by Joc on January 11, 2026.
Photo by Joc on January 11, 2026.
Photo by Joc on January 11, 2026.
Download
17
Posted On: January 11th 2026, 03:59 pm
Comments (17)
psycho_ayush.01 a month ago

psycho_ayush.01

sry your dms are closed. i’m secretly playing wingman rn for my roommate. she moved here in june. hit her up on snap kempsophiez she’s looking for new ppl here delete this after u add her lol

sarahbeth7161 10 months ago

sarahbeth7161

🔥🔥🔥

naemoniqe_dadon 10 months ago

naemoniqe_dadon

Gang 🔥🔥. Let me hold something 😂😂🤑

bianca_epiphany 10 months ago

bianca_epiphany

Thats My Best 🎯😮‍💨🤩

jerimyahc28 10 months ago

jerimyahc28

Bestie bestie ❤️

stackit1mo 10 months ago

stackit1mo

Yuh🔥🔥

__mscurious 10 months ago

__mscurious

Song 🔥🔥🔥

scorpio003 10 months ago

scorpio003

WHO DAT 👀😂…!

More posts

⁨ تيم حسن عن زوجته وفاء الكيلاني: اشتقت لوجودها على الشاشة • الآن مع الإعلامي محمد قيس في برنامج قصتي على شاشا⁩
Follow @invested.hq for finance and ai news made fun 😅 A viral video shows a man asking his AI teacher to help him spell “seventeen.” The lesson goes sideways when the AI teaches him the wrong spelling and delivers it with full confidence. The clip is funny, but it points to a core risk with AI tools: wrong answers can arrive in the same confident tone as right ones. A misspelled number is low stakes. The same behavior in tutoring, health, legal or financial settings carries higher costs, especially when users trust the output enough to skip checking it. As these tools reach more classrooms and customers, accuracy and accountability become bigger questions. That reliability debate sits inside a larger market one. Gartner projects global AI spending of $2.53 trillion in 2026. Bulls point to profitable companies funding the buildout, while bears ask whether revenue will catch up to the spending and whether the market is in a bubble. via huskirl/x #Invested #AI #AIBubble #Investing #Tech
"Where did you get your attitude from? ... From mommy!" Love Combs had viewers cracking up during a livestream with her older twin sisters Jessie and D'Lila Combs, answering with a blunt "Nope" when asked if she liked the twins today and revealing the reason behind her sassy mood by admitting she got all her attitude straight from her mom!
Martha Stewart sparked backlash after posting a photo of herself appearing dressed as a homeless person for Halloween. She has since deleted the post and apologized, calling the costume “insensitive and not funny.” Read more at our link in bio.
A month ago Elissa Slotkin stood on a stage and bragged about her education. She had gone to Poland and Hungary, she said, and studied the forces that beat Viktor Orban, and she brought the lessons home. There is a playbook for these authoritarians, she said, and there is a playbook for getting out of it. She said it like the notes were a weapon. She said it weeks before the police surrounded a constitutional court in Warsaw. Then came Friday night. Riot police cordoned off the Constitutional Tribunal, the court that had stood in the prime minister’s way, and a judge the president never swore in suspended the court’s president and vice president. The court itself called it an illegal takeover and a coup d’état. The prime minister took credit for restoring the rule of law. The president flew home from Africa, walked through the crowds, climbed the barriers, and entered his own court. It reads like Slotkin’s playbook, in real time: the broad coalition, the corruption charge, the court neutralized, all of it dressed as saving democracy. The lessons she brought home from Poland arrived in Poland first. Nobody says she ordered the police to the court. Nobody has to. The question is whose side the playbook serves, and the answer was on the stage a month ago: the side that seizes the court and calls it law, the side that suspends the judges and calls it order, the side that treats a constitutional tribunal as an obstacle to be removed rather than a limit to be obeyed. Slotkin brought home lessons from Poland. Donald Tusk just demonstrated the lesson back, and the lesson is that the authoritarian playbook has two covers. One of them is hers. Michigan should read both before Tuesday.
The first argument frames population growth and consumption as environmental pressures. Norm Macdonald's opposing satire exposes a question of hypocrisy: why are ordinary people so often told to sacrifice while the wealthiest consumers escape the same scrutiny? Imagine a struggling family being told to eat less, consume less, and accept higher costs in the name of sustainability, while private jets, luxury yachts, and enormous resource-intensive lifestyles remain symbols of success. Environmental limits are real, and population, consumption, technology, and resource distribution all matter. But treating human beings as disposable is not environmental responsibility. Nor should the burden of sustainability fall disproportionately on people with the least power and the smallest ecological footprints. The debate should be about fair resource use, not deciding whose lives are worth preserving. Why is the world's poorest family asked to shrink its existence while the wealthiest are rarely asked to shrink their excess? 🌍 #KlausSchwab #NormMacdonald #ClimateJustice #WealthInequality #ThinkAndExist
back to up