Instagram story viewer> @dagcentral> Post
3 months ago
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
Photo by J. J. Murphy on June 26, 2026.
40
Posted On: June 26th 2026, 11:20 am
Van Doren Waxter showed a series of portraits by Richard Diebenkorn two years ago. The uptown gallery’s current show, “Still Life,” presents still lifes that Diebenkorn made during the same period: 1956 to 1967. The New York critics at the time considered the artist’s shift from abstract expressionism to representation as a conservative retreat and betrayal of modernism. Diebenkorn’s position was akin to that of Fairfield Porter in contending that abstraction and representation represent a continuum, or, as he argued, “a realistic or non-objective approach makes no difference.” For him, only results mattered. The criticism of Diebenkorn was part of what Porter considered the prevailing “dogmatism” of established art critics, such as Clement Greenberg. It now seems a reflection of New York’s own provincialism in dismissing resistant developments here and in other parts of the country, notably San Francisco and Chicago. “Untitled (Still Life with Orange),” 1957, contains small abstractions, such as the slice of bread, within a larger abstract background. The strip at the top suggests a distant seascape, adding an unexpected element. “Knife + Tomato II” (1963) also appears to be a still life situated in a landscape by the ocean, with waves at the top. The abstract shape that mirrors the knife keeps the composition from being conventional. “Chair Outside” (c. 1959) divides the background into four quadrants of color; three of them contain purple and two shades of blue. The bluish shadows from the chair spill over into the orange segment, along with part of the blue quadrant itself. In a studio note during this period, Diebenkorn wrote, “When I select a subject to work from, I seem to include one element or thing that is all wrong—which works against the total feeling or unity.” This approach creates a certain formal tension; the “wrongness” allows these intriguing still lifes to transcend the genre. Please note: the show closes today, June 26.
@vandorenwaxter @diebenkornfoundation #stilllife #stilllifepainting #bayareaartist #fairfieldporter
Comments (40)
julia.b.berkman a day ago

julia.b.berkman

Never knew he did still lifes - thanks for sharing 🙏💝

christophercran 3 months ago

christophercran

❤️❤️❤️❤️

claudiarenfro_art 3 months ago

claudiarenfro_art

Oh yea!!!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

linfischerpainter 3 months ago

linfischerpainter

I saw this show a few weeks ago when I was there! Beautiful show! LOVE the comment about putting something in the painting that is “wrong.” Will remember that. Thank you.

lamo_banne 3 months ago

lamo_banne

❤️

potatochipspaintshop 3 months ago

potatochipspaintshop

This painting always surprises me in how unkempt it is 🔥

vandorenwaxter 3 months ago
p.graham5539 3 months ago

p.graham5539

What a treat to find - thank you

aidahalloum 3 months ago

aidahalloum

👏👏👏😍excellent

marilynlevinart 3 months ago

marilynlevinart

I was lucky enough to study with Dick Diebenkorn Fabulous artist

shopgirlrva 3 months ago

shopgirlrva

Diebenkorn’s still lifes are exquisite.

jim_jurosek 3 months ago

jim_jurosek

@mieyim yes, thats it. he snubs rightness.

herrbingo 3 months ago

herrbingo

Poor little limited blinkered critics

stephenlacknyc 3 months ago

stephenlacknyc

Diebenkorn can do no wrong… proof positive!

jim_jurosek 3 months ago

jim_jurosek

very underrated artist. subject matter was irrelevant it seems. it was about what he was able to convey with the paint.

Load More

More posts

back to up