Instagram story viewer> @nahrssk> Post
nahrssk(nahrssk)'s profile avatar

nahrssk

@nahrssk

3 months ago
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Photo by @nahrssk on July 26, 2026.
Download
2
Posted On: July 26th 2026, 07:46 pm
1 & 2. coffee table flower arrangement;
3 & 4. not-so-tasty soda;
5 & 6. pet sweet potato;
7 & 8. cute little coffee;
9 & 10. drunken fish prints;
11. "Bruna" through Meet;
12. Chine-collé.

#graynotebook #drypointonalluminium #aestheticcameranotebook #miscellany
Comments (2)
furquimgiselaquarela 3 months ago

furquimgiselaquarela

Q lindos seus desenhos Nair!!!

More posts

Happy sunday!🐸 #glasses #mirrorpics #cozyoutfits #frogsocks #finnishgirls
She’s so picky and didn’t like most of the candy anyway… 🤣 #halloween #halloweenprank
Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong. Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem. Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.” Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic. Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.
You feel that? 𝑪𝑯𝑰𝑳𝑳𝑺 𝑫𝑶𝑾𝑵 𝑶𝑼𝑹 𝑺𝑷𝑰𝑵𝑬𝑺 🥶⚡
My heart is with liberating the people. I arm myself with truth and knowledge. May the truth set us free, the truth about these borders, about our Indigenous identity. About how this country was really founded. The truth will liberate us. We didn’t cross the border, the border crossed us. We were already here. 🪶 #Indigenousnotimmigrant San Francisco Dia De Los Muertos Procession 11/02 🌉
WORLD OF WONDERS FAN FEST (WOW FAN FEST) MARCH 2027 #WOWFanFest #GMMTVNEXT #GMMTV
back to up