3 days agoHillary is thinking “expediency” and she is result-driven. She is correct when she says that T won’t be convicted. She is correct to think “we did this twice before and???”. The PROBLEM -as I see it- is that that exact line of rational thinking is part of the problem within USG institutions. At large. I worked for one for three decades and I blame this attitude for raising someone corrupt like T to power. I understand her. But the preference for expediency has resulted in T in the White House…twice. How does one determines priorities and what to do when facing corrupt officials who WON’T face any consequences? That is my question:-( Would any of these two ladies answer this question please? Thank you.
