Instagram story viewer> @joseaniheon> Post

Joseane Santos

@joseaniheon

6 days ago

Photo by Joseane Santos on October 28, 2026. May be an image of smiling, top and text.

Photo by Joseane Santos on October 28, 2026. May be an image of shorts and text.

Download

270

Posted On: October 28th 2026, 02:54 pm

Minha parceira ❤️te amo filha ❤️

Comments (14)

6 days ago

mariahelena_9968

😍❤️❤️❤️

6 days ago

fatiima1959

Adoro seus vídeos suas receitas práticas deliciosas gratidão por compartilhar Deus abençoe sua linda família felicidades vitórias 😍👏🙌🙌👏😍👏👏👏👏👏

6 days ago

aucilandialadislau

😍😍😍

6 days ago

aucilandialadislau

👏👏👏

6 days ago

aucilandialadislau

❤️❤️❤️

6 days ago

elianefoliveira

Que linda ,pensei que tinha só o menino 😍

6 days ago

fatiima1959

Adoro os vídeos de vocês Deus abençoa sempre sua linda família com saúde paz conquista vitórias alegrias felicidades Deus e maior gratidão por compartilhar 😍👏🙌🙌😍👏👏👏👏

Linköping University professor Peter Jonsson is set to have his work presented in two weeks’ time at one of the most prestigious conferences in theoretical computer science. As of Monday, much of that work is “dead,” he says, after AI showed that a 27-year-old hypothesis underpinning it is wrong.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic claimed this week to have disproved the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). Vast swaths of theoretical computer science research on complexity and algorithm design have been built on the premise that the effort it takes to solve certain problems increases exponentially with the size of the problem.

Jonsson expects his predicament will be “very common” at the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, where his work will be presented by one of his coauthors. “People will start the talks: ‘ETH is false, half of my paper does not work,’” he says. It’s a vexing problem, Jonsson says, “but at the same time, we learn a lot from it. And this is what science is about.”

Researchers haven’t independently verified, let alone had time to fully understand, the AI-produced proofs, which both firms have published on GitHub in both natural language and its machine-checkable Lean format. OpenAI has asked the UC Santa Barbara computer scientists who originally proposed the hypothesis, plus an MIT academic who has refuted a version of ETH, to rally researchers to unpack the proofs. So far, this effort includes a Google form asking for volunteers and feedback, and a commitment from OpenAI to fund a conference on the topic.

Tap the 🔗 in bio to read the full story.

SK is ready to fight for the win @phideltfau !!🥊💙

Come and cheer on our sister as they take the stage at PDBDC in support of the ALS Foundation!!

Правило номер 1 :
Мечтать так нагло,будто все , чего я хочу - лишь вопрос времени 🖤

Mood

WHY ARE WE PAYING TAX TO PROTECT OUR HEALTH?

This is a genuine question, not an attack on taxation or any political party.

We pay taxes because public services and infrastructure need funding.

But when the air becomes unsafe, we buy air purifiers. When drinking water needs additional treatment, we buy water purifiers.

And we pay 18% GST on these products.

The Indian Constitution protects our right to life, and the Supreme Court has recognized the right to a pollution-free environment.

So here’s a discussion worth having.

Should essential health-protection equipment receive different tax treatment?

Would removing GST help families? Would reducing it to 5% be more practical? Or would targeted subsidies and better public infrastructure be more effective?

I believe this deserves a serious, respectful public conversation.

Clean air and safe water are basic human needs.

What do you think?

Vote in the poll and share your reasoning in the comments. 👇

Should GST on air and water purifiers change?

BUFF KOLKATA BIRYANI ONLY PLACE IN DELHI🏃

📍Hussains, Abul Fazal

#walkwithhamza #trendingreels #reelsinstagram #reel #reelkarofeelkaro

Joseane Santos

@joseaniheon

mariahelena_9968

fatiima1959

aucilandialadislau

aucilandialadislau

aucilandialadislau

elianefoliveira

fatiima1959

More posts