instagram story viewer > #newtestament

#newtestament

Posts
Have you read the #OldTestament?! If not, I invite you to give it a go. Cover to cover. I have a whole new, DEEP, understanding of just how kind God is, and how much He loves me, in a way that I didn’t get from reading the NT. #mondaymotivation #jesus #newtestament
Have you read the #OldTestament?! If not, I invite you to give it a go. Cover to cover. I have a whole new, DEEP, understanding of just how kind God is, and how much He loves me, in a way that I didn’t get from reading the NT. #mondaymotivation #jesus #newtestament
A série Histórias Animadas do Novo Testamento (Animated Stories from the New Testament), é um clássico que muita gente assistiu na infância. Essa série é uma produção animada voltada para a apresentação dos principais acontecimentos do Novo Testamento de forma simples, didática e fiel ao conteúdo bíblico. Cada episódio aborda momentos importantes da vida de Jesus Cristo, desde seu nascimento até sua ressurreição, além de incluir ensinamentos por meio de parábolas e encontros marcantes com diferentes personagens. Um dos grandes diferenciais da série é sua narrativa envolvente, que procura humanizar os relatos bíblicos sem perder o respeito pelo texto sagrado. Histórias como o nascimento de Jesus, seus milagres, o chamado dos apóstolos e a Paixão são apresentadas de forma acessível, permitindo que crianças e jovens compreendam não apenas os acontecimentos, mas também o significado espiritual por trás deles. A animação, embora simples em comparação com produções modernas, cumpre bem seu papel ao transmitir emoção e clareza. A trilha sonora e a narração ajudam a criar um ambiente de reverência, contribuindo para que o espectador se envolva com a mensagem central do Evangelho. Outro ponto importante é o caráter educativo da série. Ela não se limita a contar histórias, mas busca ensinar valores fundamentais como amor ao próximo, humildade, fé, perdão e confiança em Deus. Por isso, foi amplamente utilizada em contextos familiares e catequéticos, servindo como ferramenta de introdução ao cristianismo. Em síntese, Histórias Animadas do Novo Testamento é uma obra que consegue unir simplicidade e profundidade, tornando acessíveis os ensinamentos de Jesus e ajudando a formar uma base sólida de compreensão da fé cristã, especialmente para o público mais jovem. #santidade #santos #catolicismo #catholicism #catolicos
A série Histórias Animadas do Novo Testamento (Animated Stories from the New Testament), é um clássico que muita gente assistiu na infância. Essa série é uma produção animada voltada para a apresentação dos principais acontecimentos do Novo Testamento de forma simples, didática e fiel ao conteúdo bíblico. Cada episódio aborda momentos importantes da vida de Jesus Cristo, desde seu nascimento até sua ressurreição, além de incluir ensinamentos por meio de parábolas e encontros marcantes com diferentes personagens. Um dos grandes diferenciais da série é sua narrativa envolvente, que procura humanizar os relatos bíblicos sem perder o respeito pelo texto sagrado. Histórias como o nascimento de Jesus, seus milagres, o chamado dos apóstolos e a Paixão são apresentadas de forma acessível, permitindo que crianças e jovens compreendam não apenas os acontecimentos, mas também o significado espiritual por trás deles. A animação, embora simples em comparação com produções modernas, cumpre bem seu papel ao transmitir emoção e clareza. A trilha sonora e a narração ajudam a criar um ambiente de reverência, contribuindo para que o espectador se envolva com a mensagem central do Evangelho. Outro ponto importante é o caráter educativo da série. Ela não se limita a contar histórias, mas busca ensinar valores fundamentais como amor ao próximo, humildade, fé, perdão e confiança em Deus. Por isso, foi amplamente utilizada em contextos familiares e catequéticos, servindo como ferramenta de introdução ao cristianismo. Em síntese, Histórias Animadas do Novo Testamento é uma obra que consegue unir simplicidade e profundidade, tornando acessíveis os ensinamentos de Jesus e ajudando a formar uma base sólida de compreensão da fé cristã, especialmente para o público mais jovem. #santidade #santos #catolicismo #catholicism #catolicos
Follow @powerfulprofiles for more 🔥 A fascinating theological debate unfolded when an aerospace engineering student named Nick challenged Charlie Kirk on the relationship between Christianity and politics. As a Christian himself, Nick expressed concerns about what he viewed as Christian nationalism, arguing that the early church focused on faith and service rather than political power. He questioned how modern Christians reconcile strong political involvement with the teachings of Jesus and the New Testament. Charlie responded by rejecting the label of "Christian nationalist," explaining that he considers himself both a Christian and a nationalist but does not combine the two into a single ideology. He argued that Scripture contains numerous examples of believers engaging with political leaders and national affairs. Drawing from figures such as Moses, Joseph, Esther, Nehemiah, and Daniel, Charlie maintained that faith and civic responsibility have always been connected throughout biblical history. The discussion then shifted into a deeper examination of theology and biblical interpretation. Nick argued that Christians should primarily interpret Scripture through the lens of Jesus Christ and the New Testament, viewing the Old Testament as pointing toward Christ’s ultimate revelation. Charlie disagreed, warning against treating the Old Testament as less important and emphasizing that Jesus Himself affirmed the law and the prophets rather than abolishing them. As the exchange continued, both men cited Scripture to support their positions, transforming the conversation into a thoughtful debate about faith, government, and the role of Christians in public life. The discussion highlighted two distinct perspectives within Christianity—one emphasizing separation from political power and another advocating active engagement in shaping society through biblical principles and civic participation. #charliekirk #christianity #debate #viral
Follow @powerfulprofiles for more 🔥 A fascinating theological debate unfolded when an aerospace engineering student named Nick challenged Charlie Kirk on the relationship between Christianity and politics. As a Christian himself, Nick expressed concerns about what he viewed as Christian nationalism, arguing that the early church focused on faith and service rather than political power. He questioned how modern Christians reconcile strong political involvement with the teachings of Jesus and the New Testament. Charlie responded by rejecting the label of "Christian nationalist," explaining that he considers himself both a Christian and a nationalist but does not combine the two into a single ideology. He argued that Scripture contains numerous examples of believers engaging with political leaders and national affairs. Drawing from figures such as Moses, Joseph, Esther, Nehemiah, and Daniel, Charlie maintained that faith and civic responsibility have always been connected throughout biblical history. The discussion then shifted into a deeper examination of theology and biblical interpretation. Nick argued that Christians should primarily interpret Scripture through the lens of Jesus Christ and the New Testament, viewing the Old Testament as pointing toward Christ’s ultimate revelation. Charlie disagreed, warning against treating the Old Testament as less important and emphasizing that Jesus Himself affirmed the law and the prophets rather than abolishing them. As the exchange continued, both men cited Scripture to support their positions, transforming the conversation into a thoughtful debate about faith, government, and the role of Christians in public life. The discussion highlighted two distinct perspectives within Christianity—one emphasizing separation from political power and another advocating active engagement in shaping society through biblical principles and civic participation. #charliekirk #christianity #debate #viral
Stupid or "Ba'ar" translates to moral stupidity, not intellectual. It's the one who can mature to understand and love discipline that ultimately gains wisdom. #kingdomchronicles #dailyscriptures #newtestament #proverbs #jesuschrist
Stupid or "Ba'ar" translates to moral stupidity, not intellectual. It's the one who can mature to understand and love discipline that ultimately gains wisdom. #kingdomchronicles #dailyscriptures #newtestament #proverbs #jesuschrist
Can Faith Be Backed by History? During a spirited debate at a Turning Point USA campus event, Charlie Kirk challenges the idea that Christianity is simply a man-made religion with no historical foundation. Responding to a student who questions the authenticity of religious belief, Kirk points to the historical record surrounding Jesus Christ, the New Testament, early Christian writings, and archaeological discoveries connected to biblical places and events. Kirk argues that Christianity is different from a belief system based purely on mythology because its central claims are rooted in people, places, and events that can be examined through historical evidence. He highlights the numerous early sources outside the Bible that reference Jesus and the development of the early Christian movement, while arguing that archaeology has repeatedly provided context for locations, rulers, customs, and historical settings mentioned in Scripture. The discussion then moves beyond history into philosophy, as Kirk raises questions about human consciousness, morality, the complexity of life, and the remarkable information contained within DNA. He presents these questions as reasons to consider whether the universe and human existence are the result of intentional design rather than pure chance. The debate ultimately raises a deeper question: Is faith simply belief without evidence, or can history, archaeology, philosophy, and human existence provide reasons to take Christianity seriously? 👀 #CharlieKirk #Christianity #Bible #Debate #TurningPointUSA
Can Faith Be Backed by History? During a spirited debate at a Turning Point USA campus event, Charlie Kirk challenges the idea that Christianity is simply a man-made religion with no historical foundation. Responding to a student who questions the authenticity of religious belief, Kirk points to the historical record surrounding Jesus Christ, the New Testament, early Christian writings, and archaeological discoveries connected to biblical places and events. Kirk argues that Christianity is different from a belief system based purely on mythology because its central claims are rooted in people, places, and events that can be examined through historical evidence. He highlights the numerous early sources outside the Bible that reference Jesus and the development of the early Christian movement, while arguing that archaeology has repeatedly provided context for locations, rulers, customs, and historical settings mentioned in Scripture. The discussion then moves beyond history into philosophy, as Kirk raises questions about human consciousness, morality, the complexity of life, and the remarkable information contained within DNA. He presents these questions as reasons to consider whether the universe and human existence are the result of intentional design rather than pure chance. The debate ultimately raises a deeper question: Is faith simply belief without evidence, or can history, archaeology, philosophy, and human existence provide reasons to take Christianity seriously? 👀 #CharlieKirk #Christianity #Bible #Debate #TurningPointUSA
CRAZY KIND OF EVIDENCE! None of these 4 were Christians and none were trying to help Christianity’s case. 1. 1Tacitus: Roman senator who called Christians “hated for their abominations,” still names the exact emperor and executioner 2. Josephus: Jewish historian with a war to distance himself from, still names Jesus’ own brother, James. 3. Pliny the Younger: Roman governor interrogating Christians as a threat, still confirms they were worshipping Jesus as God from the very start 4. Suetonius: Roman biographer, drops one line that lines up exactly with the book of Acts. What didn’t make the video: even fully agnostic and atheist historians agree on this. Bart Ehrman, an agnostic New Testament scholar, has stated plainly, “One of the most certain facts of history is that Jesus was crucified on orders of the Roman prefect of Judea, Pontius Pilate”. This isn’t a fringe theory Christians invented to feel better. It’s the mainstream historical position , regardless of what anyone believes about the resurrection Part 2 drops soon… and the sources get even harder to explain away. #faithjourney #bibleevidence #christianreels #christianlife #christianity
CRAZY KIND OF EVIDENCE! None of these 4 were Christians and none were trying to help Christianity’s case. 1. 1Tacitus: Roman senator who called Christians “hated for their abominations,” still names the exact emperor and executioner 2. Josephus: Jewish historian with a war to distance himself from, still names Jesus’ own brother, James. 3. Pliny the Younger: Roman governor interrogating Christians as a threat, still confirms they were worshipping Jesus as God from the very start 4. Suetonius: Roman biographer, drops one line that lines up exactly with the book of Acts. What didn’t make the video: even fully agnostic and atheist historians agree on this. Bart Ehrman, an agnostic New Testament scholar, has stated plainly, “One of the most certain facts of history is that Jesus was crucified on orders of the Roman prefect of Judea, Pontius Pilate”. This isn’t a fringe theory Christians invented to feel better. It’s the mainstream historical position , regardless of what anyone believes about the resurrection Part 2 drops soon… and the sources get even harder to explain away. #faithjourney #bibleevidence #christianreels #christianlife #christianity
It's not "Don't think about the end of the world." It's "Don't let the end of the world consume you." Jesus tells us his coming will be as obvious as a vulture eating a dead body. We don't need to stress ourselves out looking. We may never encounter the Antichrist, but John encountered many antichrists. Yet the answer remains the same: "It is finished." Our hope is in Christ Jesus. #kingdomchronicles #newtestament #jesusfollower #jesuschrist #biblestudy
It's not "Don't think about the end of the world." It's "Don't let the end of the world consume you." Jesus tells us his coming will be as obvious as a vulture eating a dead body. We don't need to stress ourselves out looking. We may never encounter the Antichrist, but John encountered many antichrists. Yet the answer remains the same: "It is finished." Our hope is in Christ Jesus. #kingdomchronicles #newtestament #jesusfollower #jesuschrist #biblestudy
When many people say "Christian," what they really mean is "Trinitarian." Those are not the same thing. The word Christian is found in the Bible. The doctrine of the Trinity developed centuries after the New Testament period. Latter-day Saints believe Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, the Savior of the world, and the central figure of our faith. The real question isn't whether Latter-day Saints believe in Jesus Christ. The question is whether being Christian requires accepting later creeds. #LDS #Christian #JesusChrist #Restoration #BookOfMormon Faith ChurchOfJesusChrist Truth
When many people say "Christian," what they really mean is "Trinitarian." Those are not the same thing. The word Christian is found in the Bible. The doctrine of the Trinity developed centuries after the New Testament period. Latter-day Saints believe Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, the Savior of the world, and the central figure of our faith. The real question isn't whether Latter-day Saints believe in Jesus Christ. The question is whether being Christian requires accepting later creeds. #LDS #Christian #JesusChrist #Restoration #BookOfMormon Faith ChurchOfJesusChrist Truth
Charlie Kirk responds to a student who questions what he describes as Kirk's connection between Christianity and politics, expressing concern that Christian nationalism is incompatible with the teachings of the early church. Kirk immediately rejects the label of "Christian nationalist," explaining that while he considers himself both a Christian and a nationalist, he does not combine those identities into the political movement commonly described by that term. He argues that Scripture encourages believers to care about the welfare of their nation, citing biblical figures such as Daniel, Esther, Mordecai, Nehemiah, Joseph, Jacob, Moses, and Aaron as examples of people who were actively involved in the political and civic life of their societies. Kirk also points to passages such as Jeremiah 29:7 to argue that Christians have a responsibility to seek the good of the nation in which they live, maintaining that the Bible addresses political questions alongside spiritual ones. Charlie Kirk continues by engaging in a theological discussion about the relationship between the Old and New Testaments after the student argues that Christian teaching should primarily be interpreted through the revelation of Jesus Christ in the New Testament. Kirk challenges the idea that the Old Testament becomes less authoritative because of the New Testament, arguing that foundational passages such as the creation account in Genesis remain fully significant. He references Jesus' statement that He came not to abolish the Law and the Prophets but to fulfill them, arguing that Christ affirmed the enduring importance of the Old Testament. To address the student's request for New Testament examples, Kirk cites 1 Timothy's instruction to pray for governing authorities and argues that the New Testament also encourages Christians to engage with civic life rather than withdraw from it. Charlie Kirk concludes by discussing the meaning of the Greek word ekklesia, arguing that it has broader implications than the English word "church" alone. He contends that the term referred to an assembly with public significance and uses this interpretation to support his broader argument.
Charlie Kirk responds to a student who questions what he describes as Kirk's connection between Christianity and politics, expressing concern that Christian nationalism is incompatible with the teachings of the early church. Kirk immediately rejects the label of "Christian nationalist," explaining that while he considers himself both a Christian and a nationalist, he does not combine those identities into the political movement commonly described by that term. He argues that Scripture encourages believers to care about the welfare of their nation, citing biblical figures such as Daniel, Esther, Mordecai, Nehemiah, Joseph, Jacob, Moses, and Aaron as examples of people who were actively involved in the political and civic life of their societies. Kirk also points to passages such as Jeremiah 29:7 to argue that Christians have a responsibility to seek the good of the nation in which they live, maintaining that the Bible addresses political questions alongside spiritual ones. Charlie Kirk continues by engaging in a theological discussion about the relationship between the Old and New Testaments after the student argues that Christian teaching should primarily be interpreted through the revelation of Jesus Christ in the New Testament. Kirk challenges the idea that the Old Testament becomes less authoritative because of the New Testament, arguing that foundational passages such as the creation account in Genesis remain fully significant. He references Jesus' statement that He came not to abolish the Law and the Prophets but to fulfill them, arguing that Christ affirmed the enduring importance of the Old Testament. To address the student's request for New Testament examples, Kirk cites 1 Timothy's instruction to pray for governing authorities and argues that the New Testament also encourages Christians to engage with civic life rather than withdraw from it. Charlie Kirk concludes by discussing the meaning of the Greek word ekklesia, arguing that it has broader implications than the English word "church" alone. He contends that the term referred to an assembly with public significance and uses this interpretation to support his broader argument.
🎬 Title: The Chosen 📅 Release Year: 2017–Present 🎭 Genre: Historical Drama • Religious Drama 📝 Storyline: The Chosen is a multi-season series that tells the life and ministry of Jesus Christ through the eyes of the people who knew him. The show explores the backgrounds, struggles, and transformations of his disciples, followers, and others whose lives were changed by his teachings. 🎬 Creator: Dallas Jenkins 🎭 Cast: Jonathan Roumie, Shahar Isaac, Elizabeth Tabish, Paras Patel, Noah James 🍿 Why Watch: Emotional storytelling, strong character development, high production quality, and a human-centered portrayal of biblical events. ⭐ IMDb Rating: 9.1/10 📊 Critics Scores: Widely praised by audiences for its writing, performances, and respectful adaptation of biblical stories. ⏱ Runtime: Approximately 40–60 minutes per episode 📺 Seasons: Ongoing 📺 Streaming Platform: The Chosen Official Site & App⁠, Prime Video, and other platforms (varies by region) 🏆 Awards/Nominations: Recipient of multiple faith-based and audience-choice awards. 🌍 Franchise/Universe: Based on the life of Jesus Christ and events described in the New Testament. 🔥 Fun Fact: The series became one of the most successful crowdfunded television productions ever made, raising millions from viewers around the world. 💬 Iconic Quote: “Get used to different.” ✨📖⛵🎬
🎬 Title: The Chosen 📅 Release Year: 2017–Present 🎭 Genre: Historical Drama • Religious Drama 📝 Storyline: The Chosen is a multi-season series that tells the life and ministry of Jesus Christ through the eyes of the people who knew him. The show explores the backgrounds, struggles, and transformations of his disciples, followers, and others whose lives were changed by his teachings. 🎬 Creator: Dallas Jenkins 🎭 Cast: Jonathan Roumie, Shahar Isaac, Elizabeth Tabish, Paras Patel, Noah James 🍿 Why Watch: Emotional storytelling, strong character development, high production quality, and a human-centered portrayal of biblical events. ⭐ IMDb Rating: 9.1/10 📊 Critics Scores: Widely praised by audiences for its writing, performances, and respectful adaptation of biblical stories. ⏱ Runtime: Approximately 40–60 minutes per episode 📺 Seasons: Ongoing 📺 Streaming Platform: The Chosen Official Site & App⁠, Prime Video, and other platforms (varies by region) 🏆 Awards/Nominations: Recipient of multiple faith-based and audience-choice awards. 🌍 Franchise/Universe: Based on the life of Jesus Christ and events described in the New Testament. 🔥 Fun Fact: The series became one of the most successful crowdfunded television productions ever made, raising millions from viewers around the world. 💬 Iconic Quote: “Get used to different.” ✨📖⛵🎬
Follow @debatecentrals for more 🔥 A fascinating exchange between Charlie Kirk and Bill Maher dives into one of the biggest debates in history: the reliability of the Bible and the historical existence of Jesus Christ. The conversation begins with Kirk asking whether there is any part of the Bible that Maher believes is historically true. While Maher acknowledges that some elements may contain historical truth, he remains skeptical about taking the Bible as definitive evidence. The discussion quickly turns to Jesus himself. Kirk argues that Jesus was a real historical figure, while Maher points out that the Gospel accounts were written decades after Jesus’ death. Maher suggests that the timing of these writings raises important questions about historical accuracy, authorship, and how events may have been interpreted by later generations. Kirk responds by emphasizing the historical value of the New Testament documents, particularly the Gospel accounts and the Book of Acts. He argues that these writings provide strong evidence for the existence of Jesus and the growth of the early Christian movement. The debate highlights the contrast between a faith-based perspective and a more skeptical, historical approach to ancient texts. At its core, the conversation is about how people evaluate truth, history, and evidence. While Maher approaches the topic through the lens of skepticism and historical scrutiny, Kirk defends the credibility of biblical accounts and the case for Jesus as a real historical figure. It's a respectful but thought-provoking exchange on one of the most influential subjects in human history. #charliekirk #billmaher #christianity #viral
Follow @debatecentrals for more 🔥 A fascinating exchange between Charlie Kirk and Bill Maher dives into one of the biggest debates in history: the reliability of the Bible and the historical existence of Jesus Christ. The conversation begins with Kirk asking whether there is any part of the Bible that Maher believes is historically true. While Maher acknowledges that some elements may contain historical truth, he remains skeptical about taking the Bible as definitive evidence. The discussion quickly turns to Jesus himself. Kirk argues that Jesus was a real historical figure, while Maher points out that the Gospel accounts were written decades after Jesus’ death. Maher suggests that the timing of these writings raises important questions about historical accuracy, authorship, and how events may have been interpreted by later generations. Kirk responds by emphasizing the historical value of the New Testament documents, particularly the Gospel accounts and the Book of Acts. He argues that these writings provide strong evidence for the existence of Jesus and the growth of the early Christian movement. The debate highlights the contrast between a faith-based perspective and a more skeptical, historical approach to ancient texts. At its core, the conversation is about how people evaluate truth, history, and evidence. While Maher approaches the topic through the lens of skepticism and historical scrutiny, Kirk defends the credibility of biblical accounts and the case for Jesus as a real historical figure. It's a respectful but thought-provoking exchange on one of the most influential subjects in human history. #charliekirk #billmaher #christianity #viral
Follow @powerfulprofiles for more 🔥 A Christian aerospace engineering student challenged Charlie Kirk on the relationship between faith and politics, expressing concern about what he viewed as Christian nationalism. The student argued that the early Church emphasized Christ above political power and questioned whether modern Christians, particularly in America, have become too closely tied to nationalism and government. Kirk responded by rejecting the label of "Christian nationalist," explaining that he considers himself both a Christian and a nationalist, but not as part of a single political ideology. He cited numerous Old Testament figures—including Jeremiah, Daniel, Esther, Nehemiah, Joseph, and Moses—to argue that Scripture consistently portrays believers engaging with government and seeking the welfare of their nation rather than withdrawing from public life. The discussion then shifted into a theological debate over how Christians should interpret the Old and New Testaments. The student argued that the teachings of Christ provide the lens through which the Old Testament should be understood, while Kirk maintained that Jesus fulfilled—not diminished—the Old Testament. He also referenced New Testament passages, including 1 Timothy, to support his view that Christians should pray for leaders and remain actively involved in shaping society. The conversation concluded with a debate over the Greek word *ekklesia*, which Kirk argued carries broader civic implications than the English word "church." While both agreed that Christianity should influence how believers live, they disagreed on the extent to which faith should shape politics and government. The exchange highlighted two contrasting Christian perspectives on biblical interpretation, public life, and the role of believers in society. #charliekirk #Christianity #Faith #viral
Follow @powerfulprofiles for more 🔥 A Christian aerospace engineering student challenged Charlie Kirk on the relationship between faith and politics, expressing concern about what he viewed as Christian nationalism. The student argued that the early Church emphasized Christ above political power and questioned whether modern Christians, particularly in America, have become too closely tied to nationalism and government. Kirk responded by rejecting the label of "Christian nationalist," explaining that he considers himself both a Christian and a nationalist, but not as part of a single political ideology. He cited numerous Old Testament figures—including Jeremiah, Daniel, Esther, Nehemiah, Joseph, and Moses—to argue that Scripture consistently portrays believers engaging with government and seeking the welfare of their nation rather than withdrawing from public life. The discussion then shifted into a theological debate over how Christians should interpret the Old and New Testaments. The student argued that the teachings of Christ provide the lens through which the Old Testament should be understood, while Kirk maintained that Jesus fulfilled—not diminished—the Old Testament. He also referenced New Testament passages, including 1 Timothy, to support his view that Christians should pray for leaders and remain actively involved in shaping society. The conversation concluded with a debate over the Greek word *ekklesia*, which Kirk argued carries broader civic implications than the English word "church." While both agreed that Christianity should influence how believers live, they disagreed on the extent to which faith should shape politics and government. The exchange highlighted two contrasting Christian perspectives on biblical interpretation, public life, and the role of believers in society. #charliekirk #Christianity #Faith #viral
back to up