Instagram story viewer> @huma.nomics> Posts

Vibhu Vikramaditya

@huma.nomics

28

followers

63

following

We must make the building of a free society once more an intellectual adventure, a deed of courage.

POSTS STORIES REELS TAGGED

All theory, dear friend, is gray, but the golden tree of life springs ever green. The highest goal that one can achieve is amazement. ~ Plagiarizing Geothe’s Faust taken in Fairfax, Virginia by @huma.nomics

7

1

9 days ago

The myth of Pelops and Oinomaos begins with a ruler who is trying to abolish the future. Oinomaos does not merely want to win. He wants to make succession impossible. Every rival is destroyed, every normal path to change is closed, and the existing order is preserved by ensuring that no challenger can survive long enough to replace it. The myth begins, then, with a world in which power has confused permanence with legitimacy.

Then Pelops arrives.

He does not simply inherit the system or wait for it to open. He breaks through it. And that is what makes the myth interesting: sometimes an order becomes so closed that ordinary competition can no longer produce change. At that point, transformation has to come from outside the normal rules of the game.

Pelops’s victory is not clean or innocent. It is disruptive, violent, and morally complicated. But out of that rupture comes a new order and, eventually, a different form of rivalry at Olympia: competition that is still intense, but now bounded by rules, recognition, and legitimacy.

And that is what makes this silent seated figure so powerful. He is watching the last calm moment of a world that believes it has secured itself forever. Nothing has happened yet. The king still rules. The challenger has not won. The old order still appears intact.

But its legitimacy has already failed, and the force that will replace it has already entered the scene.

A legitimate order does not eliminate rivalry. It gives rivalry a way to produce change. When those paths are closed, change does not disappear. It returns as rupture. #greekmythology #greekmyth #transformation #rivalry #legitimacy by @huma.nomics

3

0

22 days ago

Polymarket is, at first glance, a betting app. People wager on what they expect will happen.

Here, they are betting on the Federal Reserve’s next monetary-policy stance: whether it will leave rates unchanged, raise them, or cut them.

But the interesting economics begins once those expectations meet a market.

Different participants bring different information, judgments, and interpretations. They trade on them, and those competing expectations become reflected in changing market prices. A 51% price is therefore not simply one person’s forecast; it is a signal emerging from the interaction of many different judgments.

And it does not remain fixed. New information arrives, participants reconsider what they know, trades change, and prices move again. The market becomes a continuing process of discovery and revision.

This is the deeper point Hayek makes in The Communication Function of the Market. The economic problem is not simply how to allocate resources once all the relevant facts are known. The problem is that the relevant knowledge is dispersed among different people, much of it is incomplete, and some of it is discovered only through the very process of acting and exchanging.

Markets make it possible for people who know different things to adjust their actions to one another without any single mind first collecting or understanding all of that knowledge. Changes in prices communicate enough of what others are discovering for further adaptation to take place.

The remarkable thing, then, is not merely that a market produces a number. It is that through exchange, dispersed expectations become signals, those signals provoke new responses, and the process continually generates and communicates new knowledge.

A market does not merely allocate. It communicates, coordinates, and discovers.

#Hayek #Polymarket #PredictionMarkets #MarketProcess #monetarypolicy by @huma.nomics

17

0

a month ago

In his Nobel Prize lecture, James Buchanan, quoting Knut Wicksell, captures one of the deepest aspirations of political economy:

“The ultimate goal … is equality before the law, greatest possible liberty, and the economic well-being and peaceful cooperation of all people.”

Public choice begins by refusing to place politics outside economics. Politicians, voters, bureaucrats, and interest groups remain human beings—responding to incentives, information, constraints, and opportunities just as people do elsewhere.

The question, then, is not simply how to find better politicians or ask government to pursue better ends, but how to build rules under which even ordinary, imperfect political actors are constrained toward liberty, equality before the law, and peaceful cooperation.

Good political institutions should not require political angels.

#PublicChoice #institutions #PoliticalEconomy #ConstitutionalPoliticalEconomy #politics taken in George Mason University, Fairfax Campus. by @huma.nomics

4

0

a month ago

To the untrained eye, this may look like a random tangle of lines. To the admirer of planning, it may look like the elegant product of deliberate rational design by politicians and bureaucrats . It is neither.

What we call the Amtrak system is, to a remarkable extent, an overlay on a rail network that was not designed from a blank map by Amtrak or by a single public authority. Amtrak is federally chartered and government-controlled, yet 97% of the route-miles over which its trains travel are on tracks owned by other railroads; An overwhelming majority of this infrastructure belongs to private freight railroads.

Those lines themselves are the accumulated product of more than a century of railroad building, commercial rivalry, changing centers of production and population, technological constraints, consolidation, abandonment, reinvestment, and political entanglements. They were discovered and revised through the process of integrating an enormous continental market—not laid down once according to a single rational plan.

And the underlying network is still economically alive. America’s freight railroads remain overwhelmingly privately owned and maintain nearly 140,000 route-miles of infrastructure. They carry roughly 40% of U.S. long-distance freight measured by ton-miles; a single freight train can move thousands of tons, often the equivalent of several hundred truckloads.

So while the passenger train gives the map its name, beneath it runs a much larger market process: freight moving between farms, mines, ports, factories, warehouses, and cities every day, through routes continually tested by the economic demands placed upon them.

The map makes the system look designed. History reveals how much of its order was discovered in the process of competitive entrepreneurship and commerce.

#Humanomics #politicaleconomy #SpontaneousOrder #Institutions #EconomicHistory Railroads Amtrak taken in Lynchburg, Virginia by @huma.nomics

4

0

a month ago

This development of a theory of liberty took place mainly in the eighteenth century. It began in two countries, England and France. The first of these knew liberty, the second did not. #Hayek #liberty by @huma.nomics

5

0

a month ago

“If history could teach us anything, it would be that private property is inextricably linked with civilization.”
— Ludwig von Mises taken in George Mason University, Fairfax Campus. by @huma.nomics

4

0

a month ago