Instagram story viewer> @iserveasawarning> Posts

Andrew Sanchez

@iserveasawarning

3.2K

followers

1165

following

Anti-Socialist ❌
Check your premises! ⚠️
Anything wise you hear, accredit it to the many wise before me;
Anything foolish, assume it is my error.

POSTS STORIES REELS TAGGED

Download All

While you trade your time and energy for slave wages, political privilege is used to siphon value from your labor and your savings.
This is legalized counterfeiting 💸 by @iserveasawarning

55

48

10 months ago

Trad.Conservativism Why did you delete all the replies that exposed you and your political identity as socialist?
Good thing everything lives forever on the internet! Thanks for, once again, proving the point I made about how conservatives retroactively alter the values of their political identity in the attempt to abnegate themselves of personal accountability and responsibility for their actions!
So much cope, it’s not even funny.

The JIG IS UP ⚠️

Conservatives need to start asking themselves the real questions. Good intentions don’t guarantee good outcomes, so be careful what you wish for!

Conservatism is not an alternative to Socialism, it’s just National Socialism. 🚮 by @iserveasawarning

20

13

5 days ago

⚠️ Nobody is safe, Beware of the Mask! 👺 by @iserveasawarning

20

20

9 days ago

G. Edward Griffin, in The Creature from Jekyll Island, argues that World War I became the Federal Reserve’s first major demonstration of how monetary expansion could finance government spending beyond what direct taxation alone would permit.

He traces the relationship between the Federal Reserve, European central banks, J.P. Morgan interests, wartime finance, and the monetary expansion of the 1920s, ultimately connecting those policies to the speculative boom preceding the Great Depression.

The central theme: inflation can finance government expenditure without appearing on a tax bill.

“70% of the cost of World War I was paid by inflation rather than taxes.”

— G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve

Copyright Disclaimer: Under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. by @iserveasawarning

17

3

15 days ago

A cautionary tale of dependency, complacency, and the consequences of surrendering one’s independence in exchange for the promise of security.
The farmer understood something the ducks did not: providing for their immediate needs gave him increasing control over their future.
An excerpt from G. Edward Griffin’s The Creature from Jekyll Island, illustrating his interpretation of the economic dependency surrounding America’s Great Depression.
Suffice to say, you are not the farmer in this analogy. by @iserveasawarning

6

4

17 days ago

Scarcity does not mean “there isn’t enough stuff.”

It means that using a scarce resource for one purpose necessarily means foregoing an alternative use.

More production does not abolish scarcity. As long as time, space, matter, attention, and other means have competing possible uses, opportunity cost remains. by @iserveasawarning

5

5

21 days ago

Drinking game: Take a shot every time someone commits a logical fallacy in the comment section.

Bonus point: 2 shots every time someone says “but what about schools and roads” 🍻 by @iserveasawarning

6

3

23 days ago

Do like Randy Jackson and say ‘No’ to Socialism. by @iserveasawarning

1

4

23 days ago

Recurring banking crises are not the product of too much competition, but of insulating banks from competition through centralized monetary power.

The point is fundamentally about incentives and consequences.

In a competitive banking system, reckless or fraudulent institutions can fail individually. Their losses can be severe, but they remain relatively contained. Once a central institution protects, coordinates, or standardizes the expansion of credit across the banking system, the distortion is no longer isolated.

The expansion becomes systemic.

So does the contraction.

Griffin uses the Panic of 1819 as an early American example, quoting historian William Gouge’s description of the aftermath:

“The bank was saved, and the people were ruined.”

The question is not whether banking can fail without a central bank.
It most definitely can.

The question is what happens when failure, risk, and monetary expansion become centralized across an entire economy.

G. Edward Griffin | The Creature from Jekyll Island by @iserveasawarning

25

2

23 days ago

Wonder where they leared it from 💁🏻‍♂️ by @iserveasawarning

142

23

24 days ago

There’s this fallacy that private ownership works against working people, when in reality the worker is himself an owner.

Every individual worker possesses scarce means of production: their time, labor, skills, savings, and productive capacity. Private ownership means that the individual retains the authority to decide how those resources are used, who may use them, what terms they will accept, and when they can say no.

That protection does not disappear simply because someone calls themselves a worker. It is precisely what prevents an employer, corporation, government, political majority, or ideological collective from claiming unlimited authority over the individual.

The supposed conflict between “workers” and private property therefore misses the most basic point: workers themselves exercise private property rights every time they control their own labor, negotiate its use, save the fruits of their production, acquire property, or invest their capital.

The people who stand to benefit most from secure private ownership are ordinary individuals whose lives, labor, savings, and property would otherwise be vulnerable to whoever possesses greater economic or political power.

Workers’ rights are private property rights. by @iserveasawarning

236

29

24 days ago

The war on “hoarding” begins with a misunderstanding.

Cash holdings are not an economic defect requiring correction.
They are market signals.

When individuals increase their cash balances, they are communicating a preference for greater liquidity and a lower preference for present consumption or investment. That change in preferences is information. It affects prices, production decisions, and the allocation of resources just as surely as any other change in demand.

The moment policymakers treat the demand for money as a problem to be solved, they begin manipulating the very mechanism that coordinates all economic activity. by @iserveasawarning

6

0

25 days ago