Instagram story viewer> @wearestudeo> Post
2 years ago
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
Photo by Branding Coach | Ilya on October 03, 2024.
23
Posted On: October 3rd 2024, 07:41 am
Branding ‘evidence’ stipulates that meaningless logos are more effective. 🤷🏻‍♂️

After all, what does Nike’s swoosh or Apple’s erm.. apple really mean, right? 🙄

Yes, it’s true that there are lots of ‘meaningless’ logos that strong brands sport, and it works for them.

But arbitrary shapes and random animal logos sans-meaning are just one of the many routes available to designers to create something distinctive.

And arguably, the easiest route. Because it basically gives designers permission to design something random without having to rationalise or justify their decisions.

Something I know many designers HATE doing (because they secretly see themselves as artists). Is that you?

But here’s the secret. Savvy designers know how to bake-in meaning, without sacrificing distinctiveness.

Let’s explore this.

P.S. And for those eagle eye nit-picking keyboard warriors out here – yes, I know that my cover is a bit misleading or ‘clickbait-y’, as technically the logo hasn’t changed, apart from the colours. And it might not also be called a ‘rebrand’ as that would typically involve a repositioning. But I needed to get your attention somehow, to get to my main point about loading up a logo with meaning. Even if that usually happens through the rest of the visual brand identity with the logo being a contributing factor in serving up that overarching meaning.

#rebranding #brandidentity #visualidentity
Comments (23)
maruf_binmaksud 2 years ago

maruf_binmaksud

font name?

robmeyerson 2 years ago

robmeyerson

Does the evidence show that meaningless logos are MORE effective or that they can be JUST AS effective? (Honest question)

riggedpie 2 years ago

riggedpie

Got the same slide in there twice! Love the info tho

rolans_kims 2 years ago

rolans_kims

I feel messaging might be an improvement, but the new visual direction is a bit puke-inducing... And that is not even subjective. The contrast ratios between some color pairs are near-0 and just painful to look at (green/purple in the last slide, refreshed logo on DCI-P3 screens). Ironic given how Figma is UI/UX design tool used by many UXers.

jokiveli 2 years ago

jokiveli

What's wrong with the coffee cup for a coffee house 😂

jeremine_holt 2 years ago

jeremine_holt

I love the design, but the two logos are the same?

More posts

back to up