Instagram story viewer> @mattbourguignon> Post

Matt

@mattbourguignon

5 months ago

Photo by Matt on May 22, 2026.

Photo by Matt on May 22, 2026.

Photo by Matt on May 22, 2026.

Photo by Matt on May 22, 2026.

Photo by Matt on May 22, 2026.

Photo by Matt on May 22, 2026.

454

104

Posted On: May 22nd 2026, 02:07 pm

Tagged Users:

@wfukappadelta

@zoepanzer

@tracylbourgs

@rokxanna

@vvmoloney

@mogie_e_g

@matthew.giugliano

matthew.giugliano

@smehta5

@carsonftaylor

@sofiaimbrogno

@wilsonctodd

@innuendowfu

My love to @innuendowfu and @yerbamadre

Comments (104)

zoepanzer

5 months ago

zoepanzer

nos vemos pronto

zoepanzer

5 months ago

zoepanzer

wow im beyond honored and i miss u

zoepanzer

5 months ago

zoepanzer

NUMBER ONE DAGGERMAN

sonali.peiris

5 months ago

sonali.peiris

Love and miss u so much

sonali.peiris

5 months ago

sonali.peiris

Congrats Matt!!

quinnymusic

5 months ago

quinnymusic

WOOO CONGRATS

vvmoloney

5 months ago

vvmoloney

I like that I found out about this post via @moloneypools

vvmoloney

5 months ago

vvmoloney

comment media

vvmoloney

5 months ago

vvmoloney

Luckily IDGAF

vvmoloney

5 months ago

vvmoloney

There are just so many things I could comment but I’m going to get BANNED

vvmoloney

5 months ago

vvmoloney

The concept of a @yerbamadre from the pod…

vvmoloney

5 months ago

vvmoloney

ROMPIÓ mi instagram

Load More

More posts

one-time fifteen hundred dollars to every Texas household, paid for by pulling seventeen billion from the state’s Rainy Day Fund, which she says sits at about twenty-seven billion. Her logic is the state only needs ten billion in reserves, so the rest should go back to people. She first floated it back in July as part of her “Money in Your Pocket” agenda, and she’s reaffirmed it since winning. The catch is she can’t just write the checks herself — it takes a two-thirds vote in both legislative chambers, and Republicans still look likely to hold the Senate. No payment date has been set.

ONLY FLANS SALE EL JUEVES!
.
.

produced by @linkon

Neha Bora has sparked a controversy with her remarks claiming that women are sexually exploited by priests inside temples. Her statement has drawn criticism for making sweeping allegations against an entire community of religious figures. Critics argue that such serious accusations should be backed by evidence rather than presented as generalisations that could hurt religious sentiments.

The controversy has also raised questions about the responsibility that comes with being a research scholar, particularly when making statements on sensitive social and religious issues. While concerns surrounding women's safety and exploitation deserve attention, critics believe that using broad accusations without proper research and context weakens the credibility of the argument itself.

مثال طيب ودافع كبير للشباب 🇧🇭 🫶🏻 @haloraibi.20

Follow @invested.hq for finance and ai news made fun 😅

A viral video shows a man asking his AI teacher to help him spell “seventeen.” The lesson goes sideways when the AI teaches him the wrong spelling and delivers it with full confidence.

The clip is funny, but it points to a core risk with AI tools: wrong answers can arrive in the same confident tone as right ones. A misspelled number is low stakes. The same behavior in tutoring, health, legal or financial settings carries higher costs, especially when users trust the output enough to skip checking it. As these tools reach more classrooms and customers, accuracy and accountability become bigger questions.

That reliability debate sits inside a larger market one. Gartner projects global AI spending of $2.53 trillion in 2026. Bulls point to profitable companies funding the buildout, while bears ask whether revenue will catch up to the spending and whether the market is in a bubble.

via huskirl/x

#Invested #AI #AIBubble #Investing #Tech