
9 hours agoBecause solar and wind are faster, cheaper and more efficient.. of course we need to sort out storage but the most important thing is to reduce demand and manage how renewables transfer energy into our different demand systems
2 days agoThat gap is striking, @ourworldindata: renewables and nuclear level in 2000, then 34 percent against 9 percent by 2025. It is a great chart for IB ESS discussions on energy choices, because it shows how a falling share can hide steady output. Which factors do you think matter most in shaping a country's mix, cost, public perception or policy?
3 days agoTo be expected after the mistakes of the past that slowed nuclear. Either way we need to get back to higher amounts of nuclear faster.
3 days agoSubmit plans for a nuclear facility today. In the mean time get the interconnect agreement for it live and install the same amount of solar and battery. Then see if the nuclear plan is cleared before the panels and batteries reach the end of their economic lifetime.
3 days agoFossils are rising even if renewables are rising. Only nuclear can decrease fossils. Don't be fooled by the picture
3 days agoInteresting split: renewables are growing while nuclear declines, so the net effect depends on the baseline. How much of this do you think is policy versus falling costs?
