Instagram story viewer> @raisethebarpodcast> Tagged

Raise the Bar Podcast

@raisethebarpodcast

undefined

POSTS STORIES REELS TAGGED

GLP-1 medications are changing the weight-loss conversation. But medication alone isn’t the whole answer.

Doctors need to be prescribing lifestyle changes alongside the drugs.

We’re talking about weight loss, but are we talking enough about muscle loss?

Muscle is critical for metabolic health, strength, brain health and healthy ageing.

GLP-1s can be valuable tools, but they need to be supported by:

• Strength training to preserve muscle
• Adequate protein and good nutrition
• Daily movement
• Healthy sleep and sustainable habits

We need to focus on improving health, not just lowering the number on the scales.

Medication can support change. Lifestyle helps sustain it.

What’s your take?

Thanks for having me @raisethebarpodcast

#GLP1 #MuscleHealth #LifestyleMedicine #HealthyAgeing #Longevity

16

2

Progressive overload is close to everything.

The muscle needs constant challenge, or work taken near failure. That is most of the story, and it is the part people can afford to get right before anything else.

Periodisation is the argument that you may get more out of that overload by organising it across longer timelines.

Take a hip thrust. Six to eight weeks in the three to five rep range, where the aim is maximal strength and motor unit recruitment. You come out of that block stronger. Then the next block of hip thrusts, and it needs to be the same exercise, you can carry more load, access more motor units, and hypertrophy those.

That is phase potentiation. To me it makes physiological sense, and it is the kind of thinking that separates a program with a shape from a program that is just hard sessions stacked together.

Full conversation on Stronger With Time, wherever you listen.

Follow along for more.

9

0

Does rep range matter for building muscle?

From a hypertrophy perspective, a wide range of reps can work. But from a coaching perspective, that does not make every rep range equally useful.

As the reps climb, the set becomes more uncomfortable, it can be harder to genuinely reach failure, and fatigue can start to affect the quality of everything you still have to do in the session.

That does not mean higher reps are a poor choice. There are good reasons to use lighter loads, including when someone is more comfortable with them or is not yet ready to lift heavier.

The useful question is not only whether a rep range can build muscle, but what it costs you to get there and where it fits in the rest of the workout.

This clip is from my conversation on the Raise the Bar podcast - @raisethebarpodcast

If you want more evidence translated into practical training decisions like this, follow along.

#hypertrophy #musclegrowth #resistancetraining #strengthtraining #tonyboutagy

16

0

Each additional set gives you less return than the one before.

For a trained lifter, I use roughly 48 hours as a working estimate for how long the muscle protein synthesis response remains elevated.

Once that stimulus period has passed, there is a rationale for stimulating the muscle again.

So rather than concentrating several sets into one workout, I prefer spreading those opportunities across the week.

A Monday, Wednesday and Friday total-body structure is one way to do that.

The frequency data are not overwhelmingly in favour of higher-frequency training, so I would not present this as settled evidence that more frequency is always better.

But when I look at the underlying physiology, this is why total-body training makes sense to me.

This clip is from my conversation on the Raise the Bar Podcast.

Watch the full episode on Stronger with Time link in bio 👆🏽

#strengthtraining #totalbodytraining #hypertrophy #trainingfrequency #musclebuilding

595

31

When you stop training a muscle fibre, what you built can start to disappear faster than most people expect.

A colleague of mine in Sweden used MRI scans to track this directly. Once training stopped, the muscle fibres that had just adapted tended to begin detraining within about a week.

That is part of why I am cautious about swapping exercises too often.

A squat and a step-up work the legs, but they recruit different fibres. Move to the step-up and the fibres that adapted to the squat can start to atrophy again within a week.

It is also why I try to keep the exercise itself fairly stable for most clients, changing the overload, the order, or even the gym before I change the movement pattern.

As Matt says: you rent muscle mass, you don't buy it.

This clip is from my conversation on the Raise the Bar Podcast @raisethebarpodcast

If you're new here, I'm Tony Boutagy. I use this page to translate exercise science into practical training decisions.

If that is useful to you, follow along.

#strengthtraining #hypertrophy #musclebuilding #programdesign #resistancetraining

22

0

If you change your program every 4 weeks, the numbers going up may not mean you’ve built more muscle.

With a new exercise, some of those early improvements come from getting through muscle damage and learning the movement again.

So your load and reps can keep improving before they tell you much about the adaptation you are interested in: muscle mass.

That is the problem with changing exercises too quickly.
Just as the movement becomes familiar, you replace it and start that process again.

I am comfortable keeping someone on the same program for much longer than four weeks if their motivation is still there.

And if they need variety, I would rather make a smaller change while keeping the exercise similar than replace everything.

This clip is from my conversation on the Raise the Bar Podcast @raisethebarpodcast

If you’re new here, I’m Tony Boutagy. I use this page to translate exercise science into practical training decisions.

If that is useful to you, follow along.

#strengthtraining #hypertrophy #musclebuilding #programdesign #resistancetraining

2

0

If most of the muscle-building return comes from the first 1–2 sets, what are sets 3, 4, 5 and 6 adding?

Most of the benefit from an exercise appears to occur in the first one or two sets. From there, the return gets progressively smaller.

Depending on the review, it may take around six sets of an exercise to double the benefit of one.

That does not mean more sets stop working.

It means there is another question worth asking:
Would that extra training volume be better spent on a different exercise?

For most people, I often prefer one or two sets across several biomechanically different exercises rather than continuing to add sets to the same movement.

For the glutes, that might mean a hip thrust, Romanian deadlift, deep squat and lateral abduction rather than adding more sets to one exercise.

The return from additional volume gets smaller, which changes how I think about distributing it.

This clip is from my conversation on the Raise the Bar Podcast. If you’re new here, I’m Tony Boutagy. I use this page to translate exercise science into practical training decisions.

If that is useful to you, follow along.

#strengthtraining #hypertrophy #trainingvolume #musclebuilding #resistancetraining

488

13

Whether a program "works" depends on what you want it to do.

I ask two questions of any program: what are you trying to achieve, and how well can you recover from it?

The encouraging part is that you can make real progress across strength, endurance, flexibility and bone health by doing a little of each. You won't maximise any one of them that way, but most people don't need to. Some of them can even be trained at the same time.

The skill is knowing how much of each you need, what deserves priority, and what dose is enough.

My full conversation with Ariel and Matt from Raise the Bar @raisethebarpodcast is out now on Stronger with Time. Link in bio 👆🏼

#strongerwithtime #strengthtraining #endurancetraining #programdesign #exercisescience

62

1