Instagram story viewer> @snelsonus> Tagged
5.6K
followers
3459
following
Executive Director, Sam Gilliam Foundation and @ucla art history professor emeritus who sees lots of shiny objects. Opinions shared here are my own.
POSTS STORIES REELS TAGGED
Available in bio: “Soft Censorship,” by Steven Nelson, October 197 (Summer 2026).
11
.
Librarians define soft censorship as the removal of materials, the putting of them in hard-to-find places, requiring “permission” to use them, or not purchasing of them at all lest someone in the community be offended. In a museum it might be the rewording of a label, the alteration of a press release, the “contextualization” of a controversial artwork or the banishing of it to an out-of-the-way gallery. 

As dean of the Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts at the National Gallery from 2020 to 2025, and as one of the museum’s executive officers, I knew we were in danger of some kind of censorship from the Trump administration, and with a conference called “Color Lines Across the United States and Mexico,” inspired by the Gallery’s exhibition “Elizabeth Catlett: A Black Revolutionary Artist and All That It Implies,” we had it. 

The event was to explore constructions of race in the US and Mexico; analyze how Blackness, Brownness, and Latinidad operate in the oeuvres of select artists; and stress how attention to histories of race and racialization complicate our comprehension of American and Latin American art. 

Not the sort of event likely to appeal to DOGE, which was then sharking around looking for culture to cut, and not long after its representatives visited the Gallery’s leadership, I was ordered to move the symposium out of the National Gallery—it didn’t matter where. It went from being a major event to one that was unadvertised, in-person-only in an 80-seat meeting room at Dumbarton Oaks. 

It was not a huge gesture, but it was a significant one. By moving the symposium out of the Gallery and removing information about it from its website, the museum restricted access to it and the free exchange of ideas. Moving the symposium, which centered the primacy of Black and Brown people and their experiences in the histories of American art, was a tacit alignment with the administration’s desire to curtail Black opportunity, erase Black history, and ban the consideration of slavery and race in the interpretation of American history—an example of how museum soft censorship promotes the values of the Trump administration, becoming agents of authoritarian
50
Two exhibitions of lasting impact just opened at @themuseumofmodernart : 1-3 Pierre Huyghe: UUmwelt @huyghepierre curated by @stuartcomer and team; 4-5 Architects of Liberation: Modernism in Western Africa curated by @martino.stierli and (@ikemanubis) and team.
26
back to up