Instagram story viewer> @learnwadarsh> Posts

Adarsh Chaturvedi 🇮🇳

@learnwadarsh

43.4K

followers

249

following

Learn Something new Everyday.🇮🇳
Bussiness | Politics | Current Affairs | IR
Contact : DM / [email protected] ✉️

POSTS STORIES REELS TAGGED

Download All

Favourite = Same Ideology by @learnwadarsh

171k

3k

a month ago

by @learnwadarsh

913

38

a month ago

by @learnwadarsh

73k

1k

18 days ago

Watch till the end .! by @learnwadarsh

291

9

11 hours ago

by @learnwadarsh

2k

76

a day ago

by @learnwadarsh

418

8

a day ago

by @learnwadarsh

634

1

2 days ago

The real question is consistency.

If allegations against the Election Commission, “vote chori,” or political parties can be treated as established facts without a court verdict, why demand a court verdict before accepting allegations against Umar Khalid or Sharjeel Imam?

And if allegations of caste discrimination at IIT Bombay can be accepted before the investigation is complete, why should the same standard not apply elsewhere?

You can have political beliefs. But the standard of evidence should not change depending on whose side you’re on.

Different politics. Same standard. by @learnwadarsh

3k

48

5 days ago

Madhya Pradesh is facing a major debate over reservation.

The issue is the implementation of 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs). In 2019, the OBC quota in MP was increased from 14% to 27%, but its implementation has remained under legal challenge.

If the 27% OBC quota is implemented along with 16% reservation for SCs, 20% for STs and 10% EWS reservation, the total reservation would reach 73%.

In August 2025, MP Chief Minister Mohan Yadav called an all-party meeting on the issue. BJP, Congress and other political parties supported the 27% OBC reservation and adopted a common resolution to present a united position in the legal case.

The matter later returned to the Madhya Pradesh High Court after the Supreme Court directed that the constitutional and legal issues be considered there. In August 2026, final arguments before the High Court were completed and the judgment was reserved.

The issue is still important because it affects government recruitment and candidates waiting for appointments. Under the existing 87:13 arrangement, 13% of posts connected to the disputed increase in OBC reservation have been kept pending in several recruitments.

So, “73% reservation” refers to the possible total reservation if the 27% OBC quota is implemented — it is not a separate new 73% quota for one community.

Sources: Supreme Court of India, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indian Express, The New Indian Express, Aaj Tak. by @learnwadarsh

18k

442

6 days ago

The problem isn’t just park access. Watch till the end … by @learnwadarsh

273

16

6 days ago

by @learnwadarsh

4k

171

7 days ago

🥲 by @learnwadarsh

21

10

8 days ago