Instagram story viewer> @lastreetcare> Tagged
7.2K
followers
596
following
Abolitionist mutual aid collective organizing in Echo Park, Historic Filipinotown, Rampart, East Hollywood, Silver Lake, and Los Feliz.
POSTS STORIES REELS TAGGED
How 
Can I 
"Fix "
The 
Homeless
Problem??...
@Povertyskola

Support & follow @poormagazine @aetnastreetsolidarity @ktownforall @lastreetcare @coalitiononhomelessness SF @rvtvshow @loveandjusticeinthestreets @stopthesweepsseattle @ppehrc @westernregionaladvocacyproject @sacramento.homeless.union @self_help_hunger_program @woodstreetcommons cuz #SweepsKill #Homelessnesskills #EvictionisElderandChildAbuse #HOMEfulnessHeals
12
MacArthur Park street vendors want LA’s 41.18 anti-camping law gone. 

That was the message delivered Wednesday by a group of about 20 street vendors working near the park, who held a press conference urging LA City Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez to repeal the law in her district, including areas in and around the park.

The ordinance known as 41.18, bans “sleeping, sitting, and lying” in public spaces, and was established in 2021 to try to erase signs of visible homelessness throughout the city.

At MacArthur Park, Los Angeles Police Department officers have also used the law to ticket street vendors and displace them from the area.

“The direct threat is that 41.18 will be used to launch a social cleansing against poor and homeless workers, and to displace all those who are considered disposable, although we represent the backbone of this country’s economy,” said street vendor Ana Vasquez in Spanish.

To learn more, read the full story by Phoenix Tso (@phoenixtso) via the link in our bio or at LAPublicPress.org.
66
Last Thursday, 8/27, the mayor’s office carried out an Inside Safe operation on Venice Blvd and Glendon Ave.

During the operation, 8 people were ultimately taken into interim housing. But in the process, everyone seeking housing (including those who had not yet been guaranteed placement) were told they had to give up their tents and canopies. Those tents were then destroyed.

When asked why this was necessary, an Inside Safe rep gave shifting explanations that did not match what witnesses observed on the ground.

For some, giving up their shelter did not lead to an Inside Safe placement at all. And even the people who were placed were taken to a motel scheduled to close in October, leaving them facing yet another move unless permanent housing becomes available.

Housing should not require people to surrender the tools they rely on to survive, especially when the city cannot guarantee what comes next. 

By coercing people into giving up their tents in the hope of receiving housing that the mayor’s office did not ultimately provide, the Inside Safe operation functioned as another tool in the dehumanization, criminalization, and displacement of unhoused people.
13
back to up